Abstract
Aim: This paper traces the genealogy of the Barker hypothesis and its intersections with popular representations of scientific discourses about pregnancy and maternal obesity.
Method: Drawing on Foucault's genealogical method, this study examines the historical ‘descent’ of the developmental origins of adult disease and its initial grounding in structural factors of gender inequality and low socioeconomic status.
Results: In the more recent reproductive medicine literature, Barker's hypothesis has been used to understand the causes and consequences of foetal over-nutrition and has shifted its focus from social determinants to individual, gendered bodies. The print media has gainfully employed this conceptualization of obesity and, in doing so, placed women, and mothers in particular, as causal agents in the reproduction of obesity across generations. Such a ‘common sense’ understanding of obesity production and reproduction means that both the scientific literature and the public understanding of science has inadvertently assisted in putting women forward as the transmitters of obesity across generations.
Conclusions: This powerful telescoping of the origins of obesity to women's bodies and their appetites is in stark contrast to earlier foci on gender inequalities and changing women's circumstances.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Wolfson Research Institute at Durham University, the organizing committee, the Biosocial Society and Society for the Study of Human Biology for the invitation and opportunity to participate in this symposium. Thanks also the peer reviewers of this paper, the Life Course and Intergenerational Research Group (Robinson Institute, University of Adelaide) and to Jonathan Wells for inspiring interdisciplinary research in obesity studies.
Declaration of Interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.