Abstract
Background: The Argentinean population is characterized by ethnic, cultural and socio-economic diversity.
Aim: To calculate the percentiles of weight-for-age (W/A) and height-for-age (H/A) of schoolchildren from Argentina employing the LMS method; and to compare the obtained percentiles with those of the international and national references.
Subjects and methods: Anthropometric data of 18 698 students (8672 girls and 10 026 boys) of 3–13 years old were collected (2003–2008) from Buenos Aires, Catamarca, Chubut, Jujuy, La Pampa and Mendoza. Percentiles of W/A and H/A were obtained with the LMS method. Statistical and graphical comparisons were established with the WHO (international reference) and with that published by the Argentinean Paediatric Society (national reference).
Results: Differences in W/A and H/A, regarding the references, were negative and greater at the highest percentiles and in most of the age groups. On average, the differences were greater for boys than girls and for national than international references.
Conclusion: The distribution of weight and height of schoolchildren, coming from most regions of the country, differs from those of national and international references. It should be advisable to establish a new national reference based on internationally recognized methodological criteria that adequately reflect the biological and cultural diversity of the Argentinean populations.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Dr T. J. Cole of the Institute of Child Health, MRC Human Nutrition Research, Cambridge, UK, for the transfer of LMS software, to Mrs Estela Chaves for assistance in the preparation of tables and figures and to Adriana Di Maggio for editing the manuscript.
Declaration of interest
The economic support of this study came from Argentina: PICT 2007-01541 and PICTO 2008-00139 (Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT)); 11N/552 (Universidad Nacional de La Plata), and Spain: GCL2005 Project 05372 (Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología). The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.