775
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Synthesis and evaluation of substrate analogue inhibitors of trypanothione reductase

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 784-794 | Received 01 Jun 2011, Accepted 07 Jul 2011, Published online: 15 Nov 2011

Figures & data

Figure 1.  The reactions catalysed by trypanothione reductase and glutathione reductase.

Figure 1.  The reactions catalysed by trypanothione reductase and glutathione reductase.

Figure 2.  Inhibitors of trypanothione reductase.

Figure 2.  Inhibitors of trypanothione reductase.

Scheme 1.  Unsuccessful route to ester 13.

Scheme 1.  Unsuccessful route to ester 13.

Scheme 2.  The synthesis of inhibitor 5.

Scheme 2.  The synthesis of inhibitor 5.

Scheme 3.  The synthesis of inhibitors 3 and 4.

Scheme 3.  The synthesis of inhibitors 3 and 4.

Table 1.  Inhibition of TR by compounds 3–5 and by previously reported inhibitors 6–9a

Figure 3.  TR assay substrate 29.

Figure 3.  TR assay substrate 29.

Figure 4.  Competitive inhibition of TR y 35. (a) Lineweaver–Burk (L–B) plot for TR inhibition in the absence (•) and presence of 3 at 2.2 µM (□), 5.1 µM (▴), 10.2 µM (◊), 15.3 µM (▪), and 19.7 µM (○). (b) L–B plot for TR inhibition in the absence (•) and presence of 4 at 18.7 µM (□), 62.5 µM (▴), and 109.3 µM. (c) L–B plot for TR inhibition in the absence (•) and presence of 5 at 15.3 µM (□), 61.1 µM (▴), 107.0 µM (◊), and 152.9 µM (▪). Each point represents the average of two to four experimental determinations; the lines are based on theoretical values derived from the nonlinear least-squares fit of the data sets using the COMP program Citation31.

Figure 4.  Competitive inhibition of TR y 3–5. (a) Lineweaver–Burk (L–B) plot for TR inhibition in the absence (•) and presence of 3 at 2.2 µM (□), 5.1 µM (▴), 10.2 µM (◊), 15.3 µM (▪), and 19.7 µM (○). (b) L–B plot for TR inhibition in the absence (•) and presence of 4 at 18.7 µM (□), 62.5 µM (▴), and 109.3 µM. (c) L–B plot for TR inhibition in the absence (•) and presence of 5 at 15.3 µM (□), 61.1 µM (▴), 107.0 µM (◊), and 152.9 µM (▪). Each point represents the average of two to four experimental determinations; the lines are based on theoretical values derived from the nonlinear least-squares fit of the data sets using the COMP program Citation31.

Figure 5.  Potential electrophilic irreversible TR inhibitors.

Figure 5.  Potential electrophilic irreversible TR inhibitors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.