1,408
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Exploring the inhibitory activity of Withaferin-A against Pteridine reductase-1 of L. donovani

, , , &
Pages 1029-1037 | Received 15 May 2015, Accepted 16 Jul 2015, Published online: 25 Sep 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. The antileishmanial effects of withaferin A on promastigotes was determined after 72 h of treatment using MTT assay. The graph depicts the percentage viability of the parasites in the dose dependent concentrations of withaferin A. The values are representative of three values ± SD (*p <0.05, **p <0.01).

Figure 1. The antileishmanial effects of withaferin A on promastigotes was determined after 72 h of treatment using MTT assay. The graph depicts the percentage viability of the parasites in the dose dependent concentrations of withaferin A. The values are representative of three values ± SD (*p <0.05, **p <0.01).

Figure 2. Predicted interaction model of withaferin A with LdPTR1 (a) space fill model of LdPTR1 with withaferin A docked to the binding site. (b) Red color shows alpha helices (spiral sheets), blue indicates beta sheets, dark blue indicates the residues interacting with withaferin A and pink indicates the withaferin A docked in the binding site. (c) Ball and stick model of the interacting residues in the LdPTR1 with the withaferin A.

Figure 2. Predicted interaction model of withaferin A with LdPTR1 (a) space fill model of LdPTR1 with withaferin A docked to the binding site. (b) Red color shows alpha helices (spiral sheets), blue indicates beta sheets, dark blue indicates the residues interacting with withaferin A and pink indicates the withaferin A docked in the binding site. (c) Ball and stick model of the interacting residues in the LdPTR1 with the withaferin A.

Figure 3. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the LdPTR1 gene product. (a) The figure shows the 867 bps amplified LdPTR1 product from the genomic DNA along with DNA ladder. (b) Restriction digestion of the positive clone plasmid showing the free insert (867 bps) and the plasmid (5.5 kb) with DNA ladder.

Figure 3. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the LdPTR1 gene product. (a) The figure shows the 867 bps amplified LdPTR1 product from the genomic DNA along with DNA ladder. (b) Restriction digestion of the positive clone plasmid showing the free insert (867 bps) and the plasmid (5.5 kb) with DNA ladder.

Figure 4. Induction and western blot of LdPTR1. (a) Proteins were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE before and after induction with 1 mM IPTG at different time points. The induced LdPTR1 (33 kDa) was represented in the figure. (b) Western blot analysis using anti-his antibody using the uninduced and induced crude lysate along with protein marker. The blot was developed using anti mouse ALP conjugate.

Figure 4. Induction and western blot of LdPTR1. (a) Proteins were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE before and after induction with 1 mM IPTG at different time points. The induced LdPTR1 (33 kDa) was represented in the figure. (b) Western blot analysis using anti-his antibody using the uninduced and induced crude lysate along with protein marker. The blot was developed using anti mouse ALP conjugate.

Figure 5. The expressed His-tag fusion protein was purified using a Ni2+ chelating Sepharose column affinity chromatography. The purified proteins were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE and stained with coomassie blue. Lane 1: protein marker, Lane 2: flow through, Lane 3–5: washes with the wash buffer, Lane 6 and 7: Elution of the protein with 200 mM imidazole.

Figure 5. The expressed His-tag fusion protein was purified using a Ni2+ chelating Sepharose column affinity chromatography. The purified proteins were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE and stained with coomassie blue. Lane 1: protein marker, Lane 2: flow through, Lane 3–5: washes with the wash buffer, Lane 6 and 7: Elution of the protein with 200 mM imidazole.

Figure 6. Enzyme kinetics of purified LdPTR1. (a) The optimum concentration of the enzyme was carried using 100 μM NADPH and 100 μM biopterin. It was found to be 0.696 μM, which was used for further assays. (b) The recombinant LdPTR1 enzyme assay was performed using 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.8) for the different concentrations of substrate biopterin. (c) The enzyme inhibition studies were performed for methotrexate and withaferin A using lineweaver Burk plot. The Ki values for each compound were calculated from the graph. The experiments were repeated three times and figure represents the result from one such experiment.

Figure 6. Enzyme kinetics of purified LdPTR1. (a) The optimum concentration of the enzyme was carried using 100 μM NADPH and 100 μM biopterin. It was found to be 0.696 μM, which was used for further assays. (b) The recombinant LdPTR1 enzyme assay was performed using 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.8) for the different concentrations of substrate biopterin. (c) The enzyme inhibition studies were performed for methotrexate and withaferin A using lineweaver Burk plot. The Ki values for each compound were calculated from the graph. The experiments were repeated three times and figure represents the result from one such experiment.

Figure 7. PTR1 enzyme activity was determined in the crude parasite lysates of control and withaferin A treated at different time intervals. The values are representative of three independent experiments and significant values indicate the comparison of control with treated samples at that particular time point.

Figure 7. PTR1 enzyme activity was determined in the crude parasite lysates of control and withaferin A treated at different time intervals. The values are representative of three independent experiments and significant values indicate the comparison of control with treated samples at that particular time point.

Figure 8. Endogenous mRNA expression levels of PTR1 in control, withaferin A and methanol-treated parasites at different time intervals. The graph represents the relative expression of PTR1 mRNA normalized with β-actin. The values are representative of three independent experiments.

Figure 8. Endogenous mRNA expression levels of PTR1 in control, withaferin A and methanol-treated parasites at different time intervals. The graph represents the relative expression of PTR1 mRNA normalized with β-actin. The values are representative of three independent experiments.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.