2,019
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption surveyFootnote

, , , , , & show all
Article: 7307 | Received 20 May 2011, Accepted 17 Oct 2011, Published online: 11 Nov 2011

Figures & data

Table 1. Characteristics of the participants

Fig. 1.  Percentage of participants (n=76) classified as underreporter, acceptable reporter and overreporter by the ratio energy intake over total energy expenditure (EI/TEE) clustered by gender and method (estimated dietary record; EDR (a), 24-hour recall; 24HR (b). The lower and upper ratio cut-offs for EDR and 24HR are 0.80 and 1.20; and 0.72 and 1.28, respectively. *Number of underreporters in men was significantly lower compared to women (χ22= 6.361, p = 0.042)).

Table 2. Mean usual intakes, p-values for t-tests, ratios and Spearman correlations of macronutrients by both methods. All data are adjusted for day of week and age (in years). Figures representing total sample are additionally adjusted for gender

Table 3. Mean usual intakes, p-values for t-tests, ratios and Spearman correlations of micronutrients by both methods. All data are adjusted for day of week and age (in years). Figures representing total sample are additionally adjusted for gender

Table 4. Agreement between EDR and 24HR by ranking of participants in tertiles expressed as weighted Kappa coefficients with 95% confidence intervals