Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption surveyFootnote

This study was presented at the 7th International Conference on Diet and Activity Methods, Washington DC, USA, June 2009.

References

• Brussaard JHet al.A European food consumption survey method-conclusions and recommendations. 2002; 56S89-S94
   Google Scholar
• De Vriese Set al.The Belgian food consumption survey: aims, design and methods. 2005; 631-16
   Google Scholar
• Biro G, Hulshof K, Ovesen L, Cruz JA. Selection of methodology to assess food intake. 2002; 56S25-S32
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari Pet al.Evaluation of under- and overreporting of energy intake in the 24-hour diet recalls in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). 2002; 51329-45
   Google Scholar
• Nusser SM, Carriquiry AL, Dodd KW, Fuller WA. A semiparametric transformation approach to estimating usual daily intake distributions. 1996; 911440-9
   Google Scholar
• Guenther PM, Kott PS, Carriquiry AL. Development of an approach for estimating usual nutrient intake distributions at the population level. 1997; 1271106-12
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann Ket al.Estimating the distribution of usual dietary intake by short-term measurements. 2002; 56S53-S62
   Google Scholar
• Slimani N, Valsta L. Perspectives of using the EPIC-SOFT programme in the context of pan-European nutritional monitoring surveys: methodological and practical implications. 2002; 56S63-S74
   Google Scholar
• Van Kappel A, Amoyel J, Slimani N, Vozar B, Riboli E.EPICSOFT picture book for estimation of food portion sizesInternational Agency for Research on Cancer: LyonFrance; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Health Counsil Belgium. Household weights and measures. A manual for a standardised quantification of food items in Belgium. Brussels: Superior Health Counsil; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Nederlandse Unilever Bedrijven B.V. BECEL nutrient calculation program: Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Willett W. Nature of variation in diet. Willett W, ed.Nutritional epidemiology, 2nd ed.New YorkOxford: Oxford University Press; 1998, p. 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• NUBEL. Belgian food composition table. 4th ed. Brussels: Ministry of Public Health (in Dutch); 2004.
   Google Scholar
• NUBEL. Database of trade names. 2005; Available from: www.internubel.be.
   Google Scholar
• NEVO. NEVO-table, Dutch food composition table. Zeist: NEVO foundation (in Dutch); 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. 6th summary ed.Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Intstitut Paul Lambin (IPL). Table de Composition des Aliments. Bruxelles: Institut Paul Lambin; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Bedard D, Shatenstein B, Nadon S. Underreporting of energy intake from a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire completed by adults in Montreal. 2004; 7675-81
   Google Scholar
• Poslusna K, Ruprich J, de Vries JH, Jakubikova M, van't Veer P. Misreporting of energy and micronutrient intake estimated by food records and 24 hour recalls, control and adjustment methods in practice. 2009; 101S73-85
   Google Scholar
• Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett DRJr, O'Brien WL, King GA Ainsworth BE. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. 2000; 32S450-S6
   Google Scholar
• Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the computer science and applications, Inc. accelerometer. 1998; 30777-81
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth BEet al.Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. 2000; 32S498-S516
   Google Scholar
• Black AE, Cole TJ. Biased over- or under-reporting is characteristic of individuals whether over time or by different assessment methods. 2001; 10170-80
   Google Scholar
• Black AE, Cole TJ. Within- and between-subject variation in energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water technique: implications for validating reported dietary energy intake. 2000; 54386-94
   Google Scholar
• Black AE. The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. 2000; 54395-404
   Google Scholar
• Cole T. Sampling, study size and power. Margetts B, Nelson M, eds.Design concepts in nutritional epidemiology, 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 64–86.
   Google Scholar
• Iowa State University. C-side. Software for intake distribution estimation. 1997; version 1.02. Available from: http://cssm.iastate.edu/software/cside.html
   Google Scholar
• Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham SAet al.Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. 1994; 72619-43
   Google Scholar
• Holmes B, Dick K, Nelson M. A comparison of four dietary assessment methods in materially deprived households in England. 2008; 11444-56
   Google Scholar
• Buzzard M. 24-hour dietary recall and food record methods. Willett W, ed.Nutritional epidemiology, 2nd ed.New YorkOxford: Oxford University Press; 1998, p. 50–73.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham SAet al.Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markers. 1995; 73531-50
   Google Scholar
• Melanson ELJr, Freedson PS. Validity of the computer science and applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. 1995; 27934-40
   Google Scholar
• Sirard JR, Melanson EL, Li L, Freedson PS. Field evaluation of the computer science and applications, Inc. physical activity monitor. 2000; 32695-700
   Google Scholar
• Ainslie P, Reilly T, Westerterp K. Estimating human energy expenditure: a review of techniques with particular reference to doubly labelled water. 2003; 33683-98
   Google Scholar
• Plasqui G, Westerterp KR. Physical activity assessment with accelerometers: an evaluation against doubly labeled water. 2007; 152371-9
   Google Scholar
• Bassett DRJr, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, King GA. Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. 2000; 32S471-S80
   Google Scholar
• Asbeck I, Mast M, Bierwag A, Westenhofer J, Acheson KJ, Muller MJ. Severe underreporting of energy intake in normal weight subjects: use of an appropriate standard and relation to restrained eating. 2002; 5683-90
   Google Scholar
• Hirvonen T, Mannisto S, Roos E, Pietinen P. Increasing prevalence of underreporting does not necessarily distort dietary surveys. 1997; 51297-301
   Google Scholar
• Price GM, Paul AA, Cole TJ, Wadsworth ME. Characteristics of the low-energy reporters in a longitudinal national dietary survey. 1997; 77833-51
   Google Scholar
• Lof M, Hannestad U, Forsum E. Comparison of commonly used procedures, including the doubly-labelled water technique, in the estimation of total energy expenditure of women with special reference to the significance of body fatness. 2003; 90961-8
   Google Scholar
• Dodd KWet al.Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory. 2006; 1061640-50
   Google Scholar
• Slimani Net al.Standardization of the 24-hour diet recall calibration method used in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC): general concepts and preliminary results. 2000; 54900-17
   Google Scholar
• De Keyzer Wet al.Food photographs in nutritional surveillance: errors in portion size estimation using drawings of bread and photographs of margarine and beverages consumption. 2011; 1051073-83
   Google Scholar