Figures & data
Fig. 1 Effect of GMF on body weight and body length trends in Sprague-Dawley rats treated with different levels of GMF, shown by body weight (a, female; b, male) and body length (c, female; d, male). aStatistical significance: p<0.05, compared with control; bstatistical significance: p<0.05, compared with 20%-CMF; cstatistical significance: p<0.05, compared with 5%-GMF; dstatistical significance: p<0.05, compared with 10%-GMF. GMF: goat milk–based formula.
![Fig. 1 Effect of GMF on body weight and body length trends in Sprague-Dawley rats treated with different levels of GMF, shown by body weight (a, female; b, male) and body length (c, female; d, male). aStatistical significance: p<0.05, compared with control; bstatistical significance: p<0.05, compared with 20%-CMF; cstatistical significance: p<0.05, compared with 5%-GMF; dstatistical significance: p<0.05, compared with 10%-GMF. GMF: goat milk–based formula.](/cms/asset/2bf6cb28-82bd-46d9-abc7-f36fe60ca419/zfnr_a_11817548_f0001_ob.jpg)
Table 1 Locomotor activity in rats treated with different doses goat milk–based formula treatment by open field test
Table 2 Hematology parameters in rats treated with different doses of goat milk–based formula
Table 3 Serum biochemistry parameters in rats treated with different doses of goat milk–based formula
Table 4 Immunity parameters in rats treated with different doses of goat milk–based formula