Does the evidence for an inverse relationship between serum vitamin D status and breast cancer risk satisfy the Hill criteria?

Sharif B. Mohr Division of Epidemiology; Department of Family and Preventive Medicine; University of California San Diego; La Jolla, CA USA; Naval Health Research Center; San Diego, CA USACorrespondence[email protected]

Edward D. Gorham Division of Epidemiology; Department of Family and Preventive Medicine; University of California San Diego; La Jolla, CA USA; Naval Health Research Center; San Diego, CA USA

John E. Alcaraz Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; San Diego State University; San Diego, CA USA

Christopher I. Kane Division of Epidemiology; Department of Family and Preventive Medicine; University of California San Diego; La Jolla, CA USA

Caroline A. Macera Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; San Diego State University; San Diego, CA USA

J. Kellogg Parsons Division of Urologic Oncology; Department of Surgery; Moores Cancer Center; University of California San Diego; La Jolla, CA USA

Deborah L. Wingard Division of Epidemiology; Department of Family and Preventive Medicine; University of California San Diego; La Jolla, CA USA

Cedric F. Garland Division of Epidemiology; Department of Family and Preventive Medicine; University of California San Diego; La Jolla, CA USA; Naval Health Research Center; San Diego, CA USA

show all

Does the evidence for an inverse relationship between serum vitamin D status and breast cancer risk satisfy the Hill criteria?

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Does the evidence for an inverse relationship between serum vitamin D status and breast cancer risk satisfy the Hill criteria?

Figures & data

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date