Advanced search
Publication Cover
Argumentation and Advocacy Volume 44, 2008 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
35
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
FEATURED ARTICLES

Three Objections to the Epistemic Theory of Argument Rebutted

Scott F. Aikin Scott F. Aikin is a lecturer in Philosophy at Western Kentucky University and a Visiting Scholar in Philosophy at Vanderbilt University. He may be reached at either [email protected] or [email protected]
Pages 130-142 | Published online: 02 Feb 2017
 
Sample our Communication Studies journals, sign in here to start your access, 2013 & 2014 volumes FREE to you for 14 days

Abstract

Three objections to epistemic theories of argument are briefly presented and rebutted. In light of this reply, a case for argumentative epistemic eclecticism is made.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.