Abstract
This paper examines topics of serial arguments in different contexts and relationship types. Data from previous studies were compiled to examine the open-ended desaiptions that participants (N = 2,246) provided for their serial arguments. Data were coded based on topic type (i.e., public, professional, or personal) and disagreement type (i.e., disagreements over behaviors or ideas). These coded categories and respondents' sex were then used to examine possible differences in approach, goals, tactics, and outcomes of serial arguments. Results indicated several differences based on topic type, disagreement type, and their interaction, as well as differences between men and women. These results are discussed in respect to the serial arguments literature.