The Effectiveness of Hypnosis Intervention for Labor: An Experimental Study

Abstract

Hypnosis has been shown to help pregnant women experience improved labor and postpartum periods. The present study compares the differences between experimental (n = 23) and control groups (n = 22) on specific variables measured both during labor and 24 hr postpartum. The participants in the experimental group received the hypnosis intervention at weeks 16, 20, 28, and 36 of pregnancy, while those in the control group received only routine antenatal care. The data collected at the labor stage describe the length of the labor stage, pain relief used during labor, the method of delivery, and the type of assisted vaginal delivery. Within 24 hr of delivery, data on neonatal birth weight, neonatal Apgar scores, and self-reported pain were obtained. The labor stage results showed no significant differences in the length of the second and third stages of labor. Although the participants in the experimental group reported higher pain levels immediately prior to, during, and immediately after delivery, their use of pethidine during labor was significantly lower than the control group participants. None of the experimental group participants opted for an epidural, and they had a greater number of assisted vaginal deliveries than the control group participants. The 24 hr postpartum results showed that the neonates of the experimental group participants had nonsignificantly higher Apgar scores than those of the women in the control group. Group differences in neonatal weight were not significant. The results of the present study indicate that hypnosis is useful for assisting pregnant women during labor and the postpartum period.

Keywords:

• hypnosis
• labor
• pregnancy

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the assistance of Obstetrics and Gynaecology clinic, University of Malaya Medical Centre in the recruitment of study participants. This study was approved by the University of Malaya Medical Ethics Committee, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Medical Ethics Committee Reference No: 901.5). Written consent was obtained from all participants, as required by the Medical Ethics Committee.

Funding

We acknowledge University of Malaya Postgraduate Research Fund (PV108/2012A).

Additional information

Funding

We acknowledge University of Malaya Postgraduate Research Fund (PV108/2012A).