3,413
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Gender Differences in Reactions to the Sexualization of Athletes

, , &
Pages 1-11 | Received 24 Jun 2013, Accepted 12 Aug 2014, Published online: 04 Nov 2014
 

Abstract

Participants rated a series of photographs that depicted well-known male and female athletes in a sexualized fashion or not. In general, sexualized targets were perceived as more attractive but as less competent than non-sexualized targets, and for ratings of competence, sexualization effects were greater for female targets. Sexualization had no effects on women’s perceptions of the competence of male targets, whereas for men, sexualization affected their perceptions of the competence of both male and female targets, although the influence of sexualization was stronger for female targets than it was for male targets. These findings suggest that the gender of the target and of the perceiver needs to be considered when evaluating the influences of sexualization. The implications of these findings are discussed within the context of objectification theory, which has focused on the objectification of women by women.

Notes

1. Although it was possible to compare evaluations within the sexualized and non-sexualized conditions (e.g., sexualized males vs. sexualized females), we did not. Given that we had only two male and two female images (arbitrarily selected), if we had found differences between the ratings of male and female targets, we could not be certain if such differences reflected gender differences per se or if they were differences due to the specific targets we chose (i.e., the individual athletes). The analyses on which we focused (i.e., differences between sexualized and non-sexualized images) controlled for whatever differences existed among our targets per se.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

John B. Nezlek

John B. Nezlek is affiliated with the Department of Psychology, College of William & Mary, and with the University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty in Poznan.

William Krohn

William Krohn is affiliated with the Department of Psychology, College of William & Mary.

Dannon Wilson

Dannon Wilson is affiliated with the Department of Psychology, College of William & Mary.

Laura Maruskin

Laura Maruskin is affiliated with the Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 168.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.