![Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5947/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Politics-International-Relations.jpg"})
Abstract
This paper proposes a deliberative link in the representation cycle. The deliberative link supports the articulation of social discourses; preferences transformation and the expression of citizens’ judgemental agency. To outline the case, I begin by examining the limitations of congruence theory as a framework for conceptualising the representative system. I then argue for a deliberative link based on the concept of discursive representation put forward by John Dryzek and Simon Niemeyer. Such a link requires advances beyond ‘congruence’ for measuring responsiveness. I suggest that future research explore ‘resonance’ in Dryzek’s terms.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to extend my sincere thanks to two anonymous referees for their valuable contributions to the development of this paper.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
1. For an example of the application of Q-methodology, and its potential for measuring resonance, see Dryzek and Berejikian (1993).
2. As identified through high or median factor loadings using Q-methodology. See Dryzek and Niemeyer (Citation2008) for a fuller discussion.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Vanessa Liston
Vanessa Liston is a Visiting Research Fellow at Dublin City University, Ireland. She is also Director of CiviQ.eu that delivers innovations public participation. Her research interests are in participatory and deliberative democracy and Q-methodology.