Abstract
An historical study allows examination of the past for the purposes of understanding the present and contemplating a course of action for the future. There is, however, no one history that is the past; rather, history is a collection of perspectives consisting of selections and interpretations. The purpose of this paper is to present a chronology of art education theories and programs as well as to examine the limitations, biases, choices, and interpretations inherent in this chronology and in historical research and reporting in general.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Karen A. Hamblen
Karen A. Hamblen is Assistant Professor, Department of Art.