349
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Scientific Article

Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand

, &
Pages 29-35 | Received 10 Oct 2006, Accepted 12 Sep 2007, Published online: 18 Feb 2011
 

Abstract

AIM: To determine the resistance to antibiotics among the indictor bacteria, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp, isolated from the faeces of healthy pigs on three conventional pig farms and one organic farm in the North Island of New Zealand.

METHODS: Faecal samples, collected at intervals between March and October 2001, were plated onto MacConkey agar and Slanetz-Bartley agar and examined after 1–3 days incubation for colonies resembling E. coli and Enterococcus spp, respectively. Typical colonies were subcultured for further identification and storage. The isolates were tested for antibiotic resistance, using disc diffusion, to ampicillin, gentamicin, streptomycin, and tetracycline. Escherichia coli isolates were also tested for resistance to ciprofl oxacin, cotrimoxazole and neomycin. Enterococcus spp isolates were also tested for resistance to vancomycin, erythromycin and virginiamycin.

RESULTS: A total of 296 E. coli and 273 Enterococcus spp isolates were obtained from the three conventional farms, and 79 E. coli and 80 Enterococcus spp isolates were obtained from the organic farm. All the E. coli isolates from both the conventional and organic pig farms were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, and all the Enterococcus spp isolates were susceptible to ampicillin, gentamicin and vancomycin. Isolates of E. coli from conventional pig farms were resistant to gentamicin (0.7%), neomycin (0.7%), ampicillin (2.7%), cotrimoxazole (11%), streptomycin (25%) and tetracycline (60%). Enterococcus spp isolates from the same farms were resistant to erythromycin (68%), tetracycline (66%), streptomycin (54%) and virginiamycin (49%). By contrast, for the organic pig farm ⪯5% of either the E. coli or the Enterococcus spp isolates were resistant to any of the antibiotics tested.

CONCLUSIONS: On commercial pig farms which used antimicrobial agents, there was a higher level of antimicrobial resistance in the E. coli and Enterococcus spp cultured from the faeces of pigs compared with an organic farm which used no antibiotics. Overall levels of antibiotic resistance in the indicator bacteria isolated from conventional pig farms in this study were similar to those reported for indicator bacteria from pigs in Europe.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Maggie Brett, formerly of ESR, Porirua, New Zealand, and now Molecular Genetics, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, who suggested this project be undertaken. The work was supported financially by the Postgraduate Student Research Fund of the Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 213.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.