1,094
Views
48
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

From dispensed to disposed: evaluating the effectiveness of disposal programs through a comparison with prescription drug monitoring program data

, MS, , EdD, CPS, , MA & , PhD
Pages 69-77 | Received 20 May 2016, Accepted 30 Aug 2016, Published online: 31 Oct 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Organized disposal of controlled medications, such as take-back events and permanent drug donation boxes, is a prevention strategy that has been widely used to reduce the availability of controlled medications for diversion or abuse. However, little is known as to whether this strategy actually reduces the overall availability of these medications for the purposes of diversion or abuse. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the number and types of controlled medications that were disposed through organized efforts to the number dispensed in local communities. Methods: The quantity and type of controlled medication collected from three take-back events and permanent drug donation boxes over 4-week-long periods in five counties in south-central Kentucky was measured and compared to the number of controlled medications dispensed, as reported by Kentucky All Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting system. Results: In 2013, 21,121,658 controlled medications units were dispensed in the participating counties. Of those, 46.9% were opioid analgesics, 13.1% tranquilizers, and 37.3% “other.” During the assessment periods, a total of 21,503 controlled medication units were collected. Of those, 39.9% were opioid analgesics, 2.7% tranquilizers, and 57.4% “other.” Annually, controlled medications disposed were estimated to account for 0.3% of those dispensed. Conclusion: Controlled medications collected by take-back events and permanent drug donation boxes constituted a miniscule proportion of the numbers dispensed. Our findings suggest that organized drug disposal efforts may have a minimal impact on reducing the availability of unused controlled medications at a community level.

Acknowledgements

Research reported in this article was supported by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration under SP019436 and the Association of Accredited Public Health Programs. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration or the Association of Accredited Public Health Programs.

The authors would like to thank Joy White, our many law enforcement partners, and the pharmacists and Save Our Coalition staff who assisted with medication sorting and analysis.

Funding

Research reported in this article was supported by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration under SP019436 and the Association of Accredited Public Health Programs.

Additional information

Funding

Research reported in this article was supported by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration under SP019436 and the Association of Accredited Public Health Programs.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 987.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.