471
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Rural and urban substance use differences: Effects of the transition to college

, PhD, , PhD, , BA, , PhD & , PhD
Pages 224-234 | Received 12 Sep 2016, Accepted 09 Jun 2017, Published online: 20 Jul 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Background: With approximately 20% of Americans residing in rural communities, substance use differences is an important topic for appropriate use of resources, policy decisions, and the development of prevention and intervention programs. Objectives: The current study examined differences in alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use among students from rural and urban backgrounds across the transition to college. Methods: Participants were 431 (48% male) undergraduate students from a large, public southeastern university who provided yearly alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use data during freshman, sophomore, and junior years. Results: Prevalence of alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use was lower during early college years, and females were less likely to use tobacco and marijuana. Results indicated that rural individuals were less likely to use alcohol and marijuana than their urban counterparts as freshmen, but rose to meet the rates of urban students by junior year. In contrast, no rural/urban differences in tobacco were noted, although rural minorities were more likely to endorse tobacco use across all years. Finally, perceived peer use of each substance was a significant predictor of future use of that substance for all years. Conclusion: This is the first study to explore rural/urban, gender, and racial differences in substance use across the college transition. Results suggest that there are subgroups of individuals at specific risk who may benefit not only from feedback regarding the influence of perceived peer use in college, but also from a deeper understanding of how cultural norms maintain their substance use behaviors over time.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no relevant financial conflicts.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50DA05312) of the National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50DA05312) of the National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 987.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.