668
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) administration to heavy cannabis users

, , , &
Pages 47-55 | Received 21 Feb 2017, Accepted 06 Jul 2017, Published online: 14 Aug 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a common condition with few treatments. Several studies in other substance use disorders have found that applying repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) decreases cue-elicited craving and possibly decreases use. To date, there have been no studies attempting to use rTMS in CUD. Objectives: This study was conducted to determine if rTMS could be feasibly delivered to a group of non-treatment seeking CUD participants. Secondarily, the study aimed to estimate the effect of rTMS on craving. Methods: In a double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover design, a single session of active or sham rTMS (Left DLPFC, 10 Hz, 110% rMT, 4000 pulses) was delivered during a validated cannabis cue paradigm. Participants crossed over to complete the other condition one week later. The feasibility and tolerability were measured by the rate of retention, and the percentage of participants able to tolerate full dose rTMS, respectively. Craving was measured using the Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ). Results: Eighteen non-treatment seeking CUD participants were recruited from the community; 16 (three women) completed the trial (89% retained for the three study visits). All of the treatment completers tolerated rTMS at full dose without adverse effects. There was not a significant reduction in the total MCQ when participants received active rTMS as compared to sham rTMS. Conclusion: rTMS can be safely and feasibly delivered to CUD participants, and treatment is well tolerated. A single session of rTMS applied to the DLPFC may not reduce cue-elicited craving in heavy cannabis users.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all of the many contributors to this work including, Bashar Badran, Annabel Franz, Lisa Nunn, Jessica Lydiard, Amanda Wagner, and Margaret Caruso. We would also like to acknowledge the following grants which supported this research: K24DA038240 (PI: McRae-Clark, NIH/NIDA), K12DA031794 (Co-PIs: Brady and Malcolm, NIH/NIDA), and K23DA043628 (PI: Sahlem, NIH/NIDA).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 987.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.