620
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Spatial access to opioid treatment program and alcohol and cannabis outlets: analysis of missed doses of methadone during the first, second, and third 90 days of treatment

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 78-87 | Received 15 Jan 2019, Accepted 14 May 2019, Published online: 25 Jun 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Background: The burden of access to opioid treatment programs (OTPs) may change as clients become eligible for take-home privileges. Our previous study showed clients who lived more than 10-miles away from an OTP were more likely to miss methadone doses during the first 30 days of treatment. Proximity to alcohol and cannabis outlets may also negatively influence treatment adherence.

Objective: To examine the association between access to this OTP, alcohol and cannabis outlets, and the number of missed methadone doses during the first, second, and third 90 days of treatment.

Methods: The number of missed methadone doses was calculated for 752, 689, and 584 clients who remained in treatment, respectively, for at least 3, 6, and 9 months (50% female). Distance between client’s home and the OTP, alcohol, and cannabis outlets was measured. Generalized linear models were employed.

Results: Shorter distance from a client’s residence to the OTP was associated with a decreased number of missed methadone doses during the first 90 days of treatment. Shorter distance to the closest cannabis retail outlet was associated with an increased number of missed methadone doses during the first and second 90 days of treatment. Shorter distance to the closest off-premise alcohol outlet was associated with an increased number of missed methadone doses during the third 90 days of treatment.

Conclusions: Improving spatial accessibility of OTPs are essential to ensure treatment opportunities are available for individuals so affected. Exploring to what extent residing in areas that facilitate alcohol and cannabis availability can influence treatment adherence is warranted.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 987.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.