269
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Comparative study of the auxins 2,4-D, fluroxypyr, dicamba, MCPA and hydrogen sulphide to inhibit postharvest calyx senescence and maintain internal quality of Valencia oranges

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 131-142 | Received 16 Sep 2021, Accepted 09 Dec 2021, Published online: 19 Jan 2022
 

ABSTRACT

The synthetic auxin 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is sometimes applied commercially to delay calyx senescence, decay and maintain citrus fruit internal quality parameters, however, there is a need to find alternative treatments to reduce calyx senescence and maintain fruit quality during storage. In this study, the effectiveness of pre-storage dips of different auxin formulations, 2-(4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoropyridin-2yl) oxyacetic acid (fluroxypyr), 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid (dicamba) and 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), were assessed against the standard 2,4-D treatment using Valencia oranges at concentrations of 0.2 and 1 mM. Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) a gaseous signalling compound known to delay senescence in postharvest produce was also assessed by fumigating Valencia oranges at 100 µL L−1. During four weeks storage at 20°C, fluroxypyr produced the greatest reduction in calyx abscission, calyx browning and fruit decay and down regulation in endogenous ethylene production, respiration rate and ethanol formation, relative to other treatments. Fluroxypyr dip at 1 mM was most effective, with the 0.2 mM concentration still superior to 2,4-D. MCPA showed only modest activity, while dicamba was ineffective. H2S fumigation significantly reduced calyx deterioration and delayed the loss of internal quality factors. Therefore fluroxypyr or H2S, as a non-auxin treatment, have the potential to replace 2,4-D for commercial use.

Acknowledgements

The authors thanks Mark Bullot and Shashi Satyan at NSW Department of Primary Industries, Ourimbah, Australia, for their expert technical assistance.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the University of Newcastle, Australia, and the NSW Department of Primary Industries, Ourimbah, Australia. This project was also supported by the Horticulture Innovation Australia – ‘Citrus Postharvest Program’ [CT19003].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 231.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.