325
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Describing avifaunal richness with functional and structural bioindicators derived from advanced airborne remotely sensed data

, , &
Pages 2689-2713 | Received 20 Aug 2011, Accepted 11 Jun 2012, Published online: 24 Dec 2012
 

Abstract

We investigate whether the richness of distinct avian guilds (species grouped together based on similar exploitation of environmental resources) can be described using indicators of ecosystem function and tree species diversity derived from hyperspectral data and/or aspects of vegetation structure derived from lidar. Bird surveys facilitated discriminant analyses to establish which variables best differentiated between guilds. Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) and generalized linear models (GLMs) were then utilized to develop predictive models. Bioindicators representing foliar water content and tree species diversity were the most useful hyperspectrally derived variables for differentiating between guilds (p < 0.01) and were most often selected for describing richness. Using ecosystem function bioindicators alone, the adjusted coefficient of determination (R 2 adj) of GLMs ranged from 0.32 (generalist) to 0.58 (forest). In contrast, mean under-, mid-, and overstorey cover and mean surface elevation were the most useful structural bioindicators for guild differentiation (p < 0.05) and were most often selected for describing richness. R 2 adj of GLMs built from structural bioindicators alone ranged from 0.19 (generalist) to 0.64 (forest). Overall, structural bioindicators described more variance for open country and forest guilds, whereas functional bioindicators explained more variance for generalist bird species and all guilds considered concurrently. Simultaneously considering functional and structural bioindicators accounted for the most variance in richness (59%) for open country birds; however, combining bioindicator types did not improve upon the best models for generalist and/or forest guilds.

Acknowledgements

Portions of this research were supported by Parks Canada Ecological Integrity Funding and by an National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) discovery grant. Special thanks to Richard Schuster for summarizing bird survey data and to Dr Sarah Gergel for her expert opinion.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 689.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.