Human beings and robots: are there any differences in the attribution of punishments for the same crimes?

ABSTRACT

As collaborative robots and artificial intelligence (AI) systems are being deployed in ever-increasing contexts, we are more and more called upon to make judgements on their moral behaviour. Understanding the factors, affecting our ethical judgements involving these types of agents, would thus seem of the uttermost importance to allow for safer and well-regulated interactions between humans and machines. So far, however, this topic has been rarely investigated. We compared the perception of the seriousness of an action committed by either a person or a robot, causing harm to either some persons or some robots, and the attribution of the appropriated punishment for that action. The results showed a significant effect of the type of victim: the action was considered more a serious offence, and deemed worthy of more severe punishment, if the victims were humans than if they were robots. A significant agent-by-victim interaction was also found in the punishment judgements: for human victims, a human agent was punished more severely than a robot, while for robot victims, a robot agent was attributed a more severe punishment than a human one. The results are discussed in the light of the theories linking moral judgements to mind perception.

KEYWORDS:

• Moral judgements
• artificial agents
• robots
• mind perception

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the students that participated in the study, and particularly the students of the Cognitive Psychology course that also assisted in the administration of the survey.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).