Human beings and robots: are there any differences in the attribution of punishments for the same crimes?

References

• Alicke, Mark D. 1992. “Culpable Causation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (3 Sep): 368–378. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Colin, Gary Varner, and Jason Zinser. 2000. “Prolegomena to Any Future Artificial Moral Agent.” Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (July 2000): 251–261. doi: 10.1080/09528130050111428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, Daniel L., and Susan T. Fiske. 2013. “Intentional Harms are Worse, Even When They’re not.” Psychological Science 24 (9 Sep): 1755–1762. doi: 10.1177/0956797613480507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, Daniel L., and Susan T. Fiske. 2015. “Perceived Intent Motivates People to Magnify Observed Harms.” In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 11 (12 March). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501592112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiorri, Carlo, Carlo Garofalo, and Patrizia Velotti. 2019. “Does the Dark Triad Manifest Similarly in men and Women? Measurement Invariance of the Dirty Dozen Across sex.” Current Psychology 38: 659–675. (July 2019). doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9641-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2009. “Virtual Moral Agency, Virtual Moral Responsibility: On the Moral Significance of the Appearance, Perception and Performance of Artificial Agents.” AI & SOCIETY 24 (May 2009): 181–189. doi: 10.1007/s00146-009-0208-3.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2016. “Responsibility and the Moral Phenomenology of Using Self-Driving Cars.” Applied Artificial Intelligence 3 (8 Nov): 748–757. doi: 10.1080/08839514.2016.1229759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, Rose. 2019. “The Retribution-gap and Responsibility-Loci Related to Robots and Automated Technology: A Reply to Nyholm.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26: 727–735. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00120-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennett, Daniel C. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Epley, Nicolas, Adam Waytz, and John T. Cacioppo. 2007. “On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism.” Psychological Review 114 (4 Nov): 864–886. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floridi, Luciano. 2016. “Faultless Responsibility: On the Nature and Allocation of Moral Responsibility for Distributed Moral Actions.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Science. 374 (2083): 20160112. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floridi, Luciano, and Jeffry W Sanders. 2004. “On the Morality of Artificial Agents.” Minds and Machines 14: 349–379. doi: 10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, John-Stewart. 2020. “Building Moral Robots: Ethical Pitfalls and Challenges.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (Feb): 141–157. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00084-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grey, Heather, and Kurt Grey. 2007. “Dimensions of Mind Perception.” Science 315 (619). doi: 10.1126/science.1134475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grey, Kurt, Liane Young, and Adam Waytz. 2012. “Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality.” Psychological Inquiry 23: 101–124. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidi, Stefano, Oronzo Parlangeli, Sandro Bettella, and Sergio Roncato. 2011. “Features of the Selectivity for Contrast Polarity in Contour Integration Revealed by a Novel Tilt Illusion.” Perception 40 (11): 1357–1375. doi: 10.1068/p6897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hern, Alex. 2017. “Give Robots ‘Personhood’ Status.” The Guardian: EU Committee Argues. (Jan. 2017). Accessed January 12, 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jan/12/give-robots-personhood-status-eu-committee-argues.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Joo-Wha, and Dimitri Williams. 2019. “Racism, Responsibility and Autonomy in HCI: Testing Perceptions of an AI Agent.” Computers in Human Behavior 100 (June): 79–84. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hristova, Evgeniya, and Maurice Grinberg. 2015. “Should Robots Kill? Moral Judgments for Actions of Artificial Cognitive Agents.” In Proceedings of EuroAsianPacific Joint Conference on Cognitive Science (EAPCogSci 2015), 306–311. CEUR-WS.org.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Richard D., Natasha F. Veltri, and Steven Hornik. 2008. “Attributions of Responsibility Toward Computing Technology: The Role of Interface Social Cues and User Gender.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24 (6): 595–612. doi: 10.1080/10447310802205784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, Peter K., and Gregory D. Webster. 2010. “The Dirty Dozen: A Concise Measure of the Dark Triad.” Psychological Assessment 22 (2): 420–432. (June 2010). doi: 10.1037/a0019265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonathan, S. B., and T. Evans. 1989. Essays in Cognitive Psychology. Bias in Human Reasoning: Causes and Consequences. 1st ed. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2003. “A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality.” American Psychologist 58 (9): 697–720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, Deborah, and Susan Carey. 2007. “The Essence of Artifacts: Developing the Design Stance.” In Creations of the Mind: Artifacts and Their Representation, edited by S. Lawrence and E. Margolis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Taemie, and Pamela Hinds. 2006. “Who Should I Blame? Effects of Autonomy and Transparency on Attribution in Human-Robots Interaction.” In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2006). 80–85. Hatfiled, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Wendy. 2008. “Focusing on Desirability: the Effect of Decision Interruption and Suspension of Preferences.” The Journal of Consumer Research 35: 640–652. doi: 10.1086/592126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malle, Bertram F., Matthias Scheutz, Thomas Arnold, John Voiklis, and Corey Cusimano. 2015. “Sacrifice one for the Good of Many? People Apply Different Moral Norms to Human and Robot Agents.” In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 117–124. ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyholm, Sven. 2018. “Attributing Agency to Automated Systems: Reflections to Human-Robot Collaborations and Responsibility-Loci.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (Aug): 1201–1219. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9943-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlangeli, Oronzo, Maria C. Caratozzolo, and Stefano Guidi. 2014. “Multitasking and Mentalizing Machines: How the Workload Can Have Influence on the System Comprehension.” In D. Harris (ed.) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. 11th International Conference, EPCE 2014, Held as Part of HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Parlangeli, Oronzo, Tommaso Chiantini, and Stefano Guidi. 2012a. “A Mind in a Disk: The Attribution of Mental State to Technological Systems.” Work 41 (2012): 1118–1123. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0291-1118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parlangeli, Oronzo, Stefano Guidi, and Fiore R. Farina. 2012b. “Overloading Disks onto a Mind: Quantity Effects in the Attribution of Mental States to Technological Systems.” In Proceedings of the 18th international Congress, IEA – International Ergonomics Association, Recife.
   Google Scholar
• Premack, David, and Guy Woodruff. 1978. “Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (4): 515–526. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00076512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roncato, Sergio, Stefano Guidi, Oronzo Parlangeli, and Luca Battaglini. 2016. “Illusory Streaks from Corners and Their Perceptual Integration.” Front. Psychol 7 (959). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shank, Daniel B., and Alyssa DeSanti. 2018. “Attributions of Morality and Mind to Artificial Intelligence After Real-World Moral Violations.” Computers in Human Behavior 86 (Sept): 401–411. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, Hideyuki, Kazunori Terada, Tomoyo Morita, Shinsuke Suzuki, Tomoki Haji, Hideki Kozima, et al. 2014. “Different Impressions of Other Agents Obtained Through Social Interaction Uniquely Modulate Dorsal and Ventral Pathway Activities in the Social Human Brain.” Cortex 58 (Sept): 289–300. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanibe, Tetsushi, Takaaki Hashimoto, and Kaoni Karasawa. 2017. “We Perceive a Mind in a Robot When we Help it.” PLoS ONE 12 (7): 12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terada, Kazunori, Takashi Shamoto, Haying Mei, and Akira Ito. 2007. “Reactive Movements of Non-humanoid Robots Cause Intention Attribution in Humans.” In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IEEE/RSJ 2007), 3715–3720, October 29–November 2, 2007, San Diego, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Judith J. 1985. “The Trolley Problem.” The Yale Law Journal 94 (6): 1395–1415. doi: 10.2307/796133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, Laura, Sandra Monteiro, Jonathan Sherbino, Jonathan Ilgen, Betty Howey, and Geoffrey Norman. 2017. “Is Bias in the Eye of the Beholder? A Vignette Study to Assess Recognition of Cognitive Biases in Clinical Case Workups.” BMJ Quality & Safety 26 (2): 104–110. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar