468
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

What Do Cost Functions Tell Us About the Cost of an Adequate Education?

, &
Pages 198-223 | Published online: 28 Apr 2008
 

Abstract

Econometric cost functions have begun to appear in education adequacy cases with greater frequency. Cost functions are superficially attractive because they give the impression of objectivity, holding out the promise of scientifically estimating the cost of achieving specified levels of performance from actual data on spending. By contrast, the opinions of educators form the basis of the most common approach to estimating the cost of adequacy, the professional judgment method. The problem is that education cost functions do not in fact tell us the cost of achieving any specified level of performance. Instead, they provide estimates of average spending for districts of given characteristics and current performance. It is a huge and unwarranted stretch to go from this interpretation of regression results to the claim that they provide estimates of the minimum cost of achieving current performance levels, and it is even more problematic to extrapolate the cost of achieving at higher levels. In this article we review the cost-function technique and provide evidence that draws into question the usefulness of the cost-function approach for estimating the cost of an adequate education.

This article was a conference paper for From Equity to Adequacy to Choice: Perspectives on School Finance and School Finance Litigation, Show-Me Institute and the Truman School of Public Affairs of the University of Missouri, October 30, 2007.

We acknowledge the support of the Missouri Show-Me Institute. The usual disclaimers apply.

Notes

1 1The alternative methods are discussed in Ladd, CitationChalk, and Hansen (1999). Particular attention to the use of cost functions can be found in CitationGronberg et al. (2004), CitationDuncombe (2006), and CitationBaker (2006a). Critiques can be found in CitationHanushek (2006, Citation2007).

2To an economist, this is a doubly redundant phrase, as “cost” implies efficiency, which in turn implies minimum spending necessary to achieve a given outcome. Because this usage may not be universal, we use this phrase for clarity and emphasis.

3See CitationBaker (2006b) and CitationDuncombe (2007). Baker was retained by the main group of plaintiff districts, the Committee for Educational Equality, and Duncombe was retained separately by the City of St. Louis. For the defense, Costrell was retained by the Attorney General of Missouri and Hanushek by the Defendant Intervenors (Shock, Sinquefield, and Smith).

4In addition to some of the studies previously cited, a partial list would also include CitationDuncombe and Yinger (1997, Citation2000, Citation2005, Citation2007), CitationImazeki (2008), CitationImazeki and Reschovsky (2004a, Citation2004b), and CitationReschovsky and Imazeki (2003). Imazeki and Reschovsky, in their various publications about costs in Texas, alternately used an efficiency index derived from a data envelope analysis, including a Herfindahl index, or ignore the issue.

5 , , , are based on the Duncombe data and analyses. The Baker data and analyses are very similar, and the corresponding figures are available upon request. Both studies pool data across several years, although these diagrams depict only 1 year.

6Similarly, there is a very wide horizontal range: At any given spending level, performance varies widely.

7In fact, if these data suggest any relationship at all, it is U-shaped, rather than linear, which means a negative relationship between performance and spending over the lower ranges of performance and a positive relationship over the higher ranges. The linear relationship has an R 2 of only 4%, the portion of the variation in spending accounted for by variations in performance. A quadratic relationship, depicting the U-shaped curve, provides a much better fit, with an R 2 of 30%.

8In the interest of simplicity, the text omits a number of technical details. For example, these equations are often estimated in logarithmic form for the dependent variable and some independent variables. Also, typically the estimation uses instrumental variables for the performance variable (and perhaps others, such as teacher salaries), as is discussed in a later section.

9To be sure, it is uncontroversial that higher FRL is associated with lower district performance, but the statistical evidence that extra spending systematically raises performance over the observed range is highly controversial. Student-level data from Missouri indicates no relationship between spending and performance of African American FRL students (CitationPodgursky, Smith, & Springer, 2007, Figure 10).

10Because of the specific functional form, the estimate varies modestly depending on the percentage of students that are Black. The estimate just given is for the average district in the state, whereas for St. Louis, the figure is 85% (CitationBaker, 2006b). The estimate in CitationDuncombe (2007) also implies a substantial premium, but because of the way that race entered the equation (interacted with FRL) the interpretation is less straightforward.

11The collective bargaining environment is a textbook case of the violation of the competitive price-taking assumption for inputs, as the impersonal forces of the market are replaced by relative bargaining power.

12Some practitioners (including CitationBaker, 2006b) use regional cost indexes instead of teacher salaries. This avoids some of the difficulties previously discussed but may only weakly reflect prices faced by districts.

13Duncombe's equation includes performance (instrumented), teacher salaries (instrumented), % FRL, % FRL × % black, % SPED, indicator for K-12 district, a set of indicators for district size, property values, district income, state aid relative to income, % college educated, % age 65 or older, % housing units owner occupied, median housing price relative to average property values, and a series of year indicators.

14This variation could be the result of inadequate controls for true differences across districts. For example, the percentage of FRL students is likely to be a poor measure of the variation in resources that students receive at home across districts, especially across relatively high-poverty districts. Yet these coarse measures are often the only measures available to researchers or to those designing and implementing school funding formulas. However, as previous analyses of achievement show, even with exceptional measures of district characteristics, much of the variation in achievement for districts with the same spending is likely to remain.

15Other methods have also been used, which attempt to identify statistically the points at or near the bottom of figures comparable to . These methods, stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment methods, have been used by Duncombe and others in earlier publications (see, e.g., CitationDuncombe, Ruggiero, & Yinger, 1996; CitationGrosskopf, Hayes, Taylor, & Weber, 1997). Recent work, however, including that presented in court, focuses on the method discussed in the text.

16Cost function analysts acknowledge that they are only estimating “average efficiency,” a term that would seem to modify the definition of cost. However, they continue to state that the estimated cost figures represent what is “necessary” or “required” to achieve any given result, which effectively restores the original definition. and use the “required” terminology, from CitationDuncombe (2007).

17 CitationDuncombe (2007) identifies this as the Missouri School Improvement Program standard for St. Louis in 2008. This target happened to be near the state average in 2005, of 25.6.

18The fact that the process starts from a logically flawed base can still be seen in by examining the large number of “deficit” dots to the right of the vertical line. These are districts that are found to spend less than “required” to meet the standard that they are already meeting.

19 CitationDuncombe (2006) and CitationBaker (2006a) have argued that the upward tilt in diagrams such as this in Kansas (Duncombe) and other states (Baker) provide some evidence in support of the approach's statistical validity (albeit a “fairly weak validity test” in Duncombe's view). However, as our step-by-step derivation shows, the tilt simply reflects the estimated sign of Å1. The point is that any positive estimate of Å1, even if it is highly problematic (for reasons such as those discussed in the next section), will necessarily generate a positive tilt in a diagram such as . Thus, a positive tilt is of no independent value in assessing the validity of the cost-function estimates.

20When “teacher salaries” is used as an input price control (as in CitationDuncombe, 2007), it is also treated as a troublesome explanator and instrumented.

21The Missouri cost functions suffered from both problems discussed in this paragraph, although the point was somewhat moot because the instruments chosen were invalid.

22It should be pointed out that and are not necessarily representative of all student outcome measures. If one took a different grade to look at these relationships or looked at reading instead of math, most alternatives actually give insignificant relationships between spending and achievement, and frequently they have the wrong sign. This might be expected, as the regressions are drawing lines through these clouds of points with little shape to the points that allow estimating such a relationship. A few districts performing at a slightly different point in the cloud can change the slope of the relationship.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 309.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.