Mathematics Curriculum Systems: Models for Analysis of Curricular Innovation and Development

Abstract

Defining challenging curriculum first requires an examination of what is meant by curriculum. This discussion of challenging curriculum is motivated by the evaluation of the National Science Foundation's Math and Science Partnership Program. Standards frameworks, textbooks, software, and pedagogy are some aspects of curricula. The level of challenge of a curriculum is a locally defined, qualitative characteristic that depends on the curriculum system. The structure of a curriculum system is proposed to investigate the purposes, representations, and conceptual systems inherent in models of curriculum that are part of mathematics teaching and learning initiatives. Three types of models are proposed: content focused, pedagogically focused, and learner centered. The models draw on examples from the Math and Science Partnership portfolio and from other areas of the literature on mathematics curriculum.

Acknowledgment

This study is one in a series of substudies for the Math and Science Partnership Program Evaluation (MSP-PE) conducted for the National Science Foundation's MSP Program. The MSP-PE is conducted under Contract No. EHR-0456995. Since 2007, Bernice Anderson, Ed.D., Senior Advisor for Evaluation, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, has served as the National Science Foundation Program Officer. The author, from George Mason University, is Margret A. Hjalmarson, Ph.D.

The MSP-PE is led by COSMOS Corporation in current partnership with George Mason University (GMU) and Brown University. Robert K. Yin (COSMOS) serves as Principal Investigator and Jennifer Scherer (COSMOS) serves as one of three Co-Principal Investigators. Additional Co-Principal Investigators and their collaborating institutions (including discipline departments and math centers) are Patricia Moyer-Packenham (USU, formerly GMU) and Kenneth Wong (Brown).

Notes

¹For more information, see http://www.keypress.com/sketchpad