450
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

I Agreed with What? Memory for Simple Argument Claims

, , &
Pages 52-84 | Published online: 25 Mar 2008
 

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to examine how precisely readers recall the claims of arguments that they have just read. Participants read simple, 2-clause arguments such as, “The U.S. is right to intervene in other countries' affairs because local events can catastrophically impact the entire world.” Participants then evaluated each argument with respect to agreement or fit and recalled either the claim or the complete argument. The first 2 experiments found that readers have difficulty precisely recalling the main predicate of the claim (e.g., “should intervene” or “is right to intervene”) as accurately as they do the theme of the argument. Furthermore, a comparison with predicates of short narrative statements indicates that this recall difficulty is specific to argument predicates. Experiment 3 found that skilled readers' recall was more accurate than less-skilled readers. It also showed that the predicate recall problem occurred with both skilled and less-skilled readers and that it is related to one's ability to detect poorly formed arguments.

Notes

1The focus of follow-up analyses are on the verbatim analysus because it is the most stringent criterion and most apt to show subtle differences.

2We also conducted a regression analysis using the verbatim recall data to assess the impact of recall skill on flawed judgment detection. The criterion variable was the judgment score averaged across good and unwarranted judgments for each participant. We entered the Nelson–Denny score in the first step to control for reading skill. The average recall scores for the predicate were then entered in the second step. The regression equation significantly predicted flawed judgment performance, F(2, 78) = 6.17, MSE = .023, p < .01, R 2 = .137. Predicate recall scores accounted for a significant change in R 2 after controlling for Nelson–Denny, F(1, 78) = 6.01, p < .02, R 2 = .066. The B for Nelson–Denny in the full model was .145 (t = 1.45, p = .216), and the B for predicate recall in the final model was .284 (t = 2.45, p < .02). Thus, predicate recall ability significantly predicted flawed judgment performance over and above the effect of reading skill.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 192.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.