1,255
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
 

Abstract

Problem, research strategy, and findings

Incentive zoning provides bonuses to developers (e.g., increased density or height) in return for public amenities (e.g., affordable housing or green buildings). We surveyed and interviewed local officials to investigate a) the adoption rate of incentive zoning across the United States, b) the bonuses offered to developers and the amenities sought by governments, c) whether municipalities conduct a cost–benefit analysis between bonuses and amenities, and d) the relationship between local autonomy, growth, public participation, and incentive zoning. Forty-one percent of surveyed communities reported having incentive zoning. The most common bonus offered to developers was density. The most common amenities sought by municipalities were mixed-use development, open space conservation, walkability, affordable housing, and public parks. Most communities did not conduct a cost–benefit analysis while developing or applying incentive zoning, which we found was correlated to lower utilization. Some communities used incentive zoning to entice developers to provide benefits (e.g., affordable housing or green buildings) that state legislation prohibited them from requiring.

Takeaway for practice

Planners can use incentive zoning to induce developers to provide public amenities as part of their projects, especially when the political, market, or legal environment is not conducive to requiring desired amenities. Our findings suggest that planners and local officials frustrated by state preemptions in certain land use areas can investigate incentive zoning to achieve local goals. Also, practitioners must find ways to make the incentives attractive to developers while maximizing community benefit.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

George C. Homsy

GEORGE C. HOMSY, AICP ([email protected]), studies sustainability policies and planning strategies at Binghamton University, where he directs the Environmental Studies Program.

Ki Eun Kang

KI EUN KANG ([email protected]) is a postdoctoral researcher with the Institute for Science, Technology, and Public Policy in the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M University.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 226.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.