Zoning Incentives

References

• AECOM. (2014). Incentive zoning analysis. City of San Diego. https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/planning/community/profiles/greatergoldenhill/pdf/gghincentive.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Been, V. (2010). Community benefits agreements: A new local government tool or another variation on the exactions theme? The University of Chicago Law Review, 77(1), 5–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (1995). Zoning or discretionary action: Certainty and responsiveness in implementing planning policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9501400203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calavita, N. (2015). Value capture and community benefits. Zoning Practice, 2015(6). https://www.planning.org/publications/document/9006877/
   Google Scholar
• Costonis, J. J. (1972). The Chicago plan: Incentive zoning and the preservation of urban landmarks. Harvard Law Review, 85(3), 574–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/1339624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (2020). Downtown Oakland specific plan: Incentive program feasibility study. City of Oakland, Planning and Building Department. https://www.oaklandca.gov/documents/related-to/topics/downtown-oakland-specific-plan
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, L. A. (2019). Value capture in situ: Participation, evaluation, and signaling in Kansas City, MO. Journal of Planning Education and Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X19873953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischler, R. Six stories of zoning. In E. Sclar, B. Baird-Zars, L. A. Fischer, & V. E. Stahl (Eds.), Zoning: A guide for 21st-century planning. (pp. 16–36). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freilich, R. H., & Popowitz, N. M. (2013). How local governments can resolve Koontz’s prohibitions on ad hoc land use restrictions. The Urban Lawyer, 45(4), 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frug, G. E., & Barron, D. J. (2008). City bound: How states stifle urban innovation. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Getzels, J., & Jaffe, M. (1988). Zoning bonuses in central cities. (No. 410; Planning Advisory Service). American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gündeş, S., & Yildirim, Ş. U. (2015). The use of incentives in fostering green buildings. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 32(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2015.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homsy, G. C., & Lambright, K. T. (2021). Beyond community characteristics: A leader’s gender and local government adoption of energy conservation practices and redistributive programmes. Local Environment, 26(2), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1886068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homsy, G. C., Liu, Z., & Warner, M. E. (2019). Multilevel governance: Framing the integration of top-down and bottom-up policymaking. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1491597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International City/County Management Association. (2016). Local government sustainability practices. https://icma.org/documents/icma-survey-research-2015-local-government-sustainability-practices-survey-report
   Google Scholar
• Jeddi Yeganeh, A., McCoy, A. P., & Hankey, S. (2019). Green affordable housing: Cost-benefit analysis for zoning incentives. Sustainability, 11(22), 6269. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, K.-E., & Homsy, G. C. (2020). Make me a better offer: Developer threats and regional competition for land development projects. Economic Development Quarterly, 34(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242419897124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karl F. Seidman Consulting Services. (2015). Cambridge, incentive zoning ordinance nexus study. City of Cambridge Community Development Department. https://www.cambridgema.gov/-/media/Files/CDD/Housing/incentivezoning/hsg_Incentive_Zoning_Nexus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kayden, J. S. (1991a). Market-based regulatory approaches: A comparative discussion of environmental and land use techniques in the United States. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 19, 565–580.
   Google Scholar
• Kayden, J. S. (1991b). Zoning for dollars: New rules for an old game: Comments on the Municipal Art Society and Nollan cases. Washington University Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, 39(1), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (1993). Sharing power: Public governance and private markets. Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M. J. (2001). Privatizing creation of the public realm: The fruits of New York City’s incentive zoning ordinance. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 28, 637–719.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (2020a). Negotiation or schedule-based? Examining the strengths and weaknesses of the public benefit exaction strategies of Boston and Seattle. Journal of the American Planning Association, 86(2), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1691040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (2020b). Upzoning and value capture: How U.S. local governments use land use regulation power to create and capture value from real estate developments. Land Use Policy, 95, 104624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Aldag, A. M., & Warner, M. E. (2021). Blocking the progressive city: How state pre-emptions undermine labour rights in the USA. Urban Studies, 58(6), 1158–1175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020910337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, R. M. (2012). Political decision-making and the local provision of public goods: The case of municipal climate protection in the US. Urban Studies, 49(11), 2399–2417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011427183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristine, M. (2007). Designs on the public: The private lives of New York’s public spaces. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwartler, M. (1989). Legislating aesthetics:The role of zoning in designing cities. In C. M. Haar & J. S. Kayden (Eds.), Zoning and the American dream: Promises still to leep. (1st ed., pp. 187–220). APA Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lassar, T. J. (1989). Carrots & sticks: New zoning downtown. Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, N. (1991). New York City zoning—1961-1991: Turning back the clock but with an up-to-the-minute social agenda. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 19(3), 707–726.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A. A. (2013). Trading density for benefits: Toronto and Vancouver compared (Vol. 13). Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. (2000). Incentive zoning: Meeting urban design and affordable housing objectives (Planning Advisory Service Report No. 494). American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhija, V., Das, A., Regus, L., & Tsay, S. S. (2015). The tradeoffs of inclusionary zoning: What do we know and what do we need to know? Planning Practice & Research, 30(2), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1008793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. (2015). The mega-event syndrome: Why so much goes wrong in mega-event planning and what to do about it. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1038292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizor, P. J. (1986). Making TDR work: A study of program implementation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 52(2), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368608976620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Health Law Center. (2020). Dillon’s rule, home rule, and preemption. Public Health Law Center.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Q. K., Fan, K., & Chan, E. H. W. (2016). Regulatory incentives for green buildings: Gross floor area concessions. Building Research & Information, 44(5-6), 675–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1181874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. J. (2011). Dillon’s rule is from Mars, home rule is from Venus: Local government autonomy and the rules of statutory construction. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 41(4), 662–685. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjr030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffner, P., Waxman, J. (2009). Green zoning: Creating sustainable communities through incentive zoning. Taubman Center for State and Local Government, Harvard Kennedy School. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/index.php/content/download/68784/1247946/version/1/file/schaffner_waxman.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sclar, E. (2020). The financialization of zoning and the fungibility of air rights. In E. Sclar, B. Baird-Zars, L. A. Fischer, & V. E. Stahl (Eds.), Zoning: A guide for 21st-century planning. (pp. 37–54). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Selmi, D. P. (2010). The contract transformation in land use regulation. Stanford Law Review, 63, 591–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Special Regulations Applying to FRESH Food Stores. (2009). 63–212 Zoning Resolution of the City of New York § 63. http://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/zoning/access-text.page
   Google Scholar
• Sterk, S. E., & Peñalver, E. M. (2011). Land use regulation. Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thaden, E., & Wang, R. (2017). Inclusionary housing in the United States: Prevalence, impact, and practices (Working Paper WP17ET1; p. 67). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, L. C. (2013). Land value capture in policy and practice. Journal of Property Tax Assessment and Administration, 10(2), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., & Balachandran, S. (2021). Inclusionary housing in the United States: Dynamics of local policy and outcomes in diverse markets. Housing Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2021.1929863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolman, H., McManmon, R., Bell, M., & Brunori, D. (2008). Comparing local government autonomy across states. Proceedings: Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, 101, 377–383. http://www.ntanet.org/wp-content/uploads/proceedings/2008/046-wolman-comparing-local-government-2008-nta-proceedings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yowell, A. (2007). That’s where we print the money: Trading increased density for public amenities. New York University Environmental Law Journal, 15, 493–539.
   Google Scholar