506
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Social workers as double agents: critical inquiry, social work education, and the youth question

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 85-96 | Received 09 Mar 2019, Accepted 01 Aug 2019, Published online: 11 Aug 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Contemporary iterations of the youth question present social work with a generative challenge to imagine the education needs of youth as social work students, and at the same time, to imagine the intervention needs of youth as service users. This paper engages this challenge through an empirical case that confronted us with our own preconceived understandings of young people and social work: a funded project to support the program evaluation capacity of a national network of youth centers in Canada. Working through three tensions that emerged in this work—(1) assumptions about youth and workers, (2) participation as a best-practice, and (3) how local data collection practices are networked to ambiguous, ongoing social processes—we reflect project learning and youth studies literature together to explore the possibilities of ‘critical inquiry skills’ in social work education. As we develop the concept here, critical inquiry skills are a means to encourage young people to see themselves as simultaneously within and outside of the categories and approaches they are taught and subjected to, and by extension, to invite and support newcomers to make the discipline and profession their own.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge funding from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada for their support of this project (File #890-2015-0046). In addition, we would like to acknowledge the contributions of Rob Shields (U of Alberta), Tom Murphy (Distil Mobile), Will White and Les Voakes (Youth Centres Canada).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [890-2015-0046].

Notes on contributors

Tina E. Wilson

Tina E. Wilson is a doctoral candidate in social work at McMaster University.

Sarah L. Todd

Sarah L. Todd is a Professor in the School of Social Work at Carleton University.

Katherine Occhiuto

Katherine Occhiuto is a doctoral candidate in social work at Carleton University.

J. Z. Garrod

J. Z. Garrod is an instructor in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at Carleton University.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 529.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.