![Sample our Food Science & Technology journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5936/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Food-Science-Technology.jpg"})
Abstract
Two methods for the determination of aflatoxin B1(AFB1) in olive oil were tested and compared. In method A the oil sample was mixed with methanol + water (60 + 40), extracted with hexane and then with chloroform. Chloroform was evaporated and the residue was dissolved with dichloromethane which was then transferred for clean-up onto a silica ‘Sep-Pak’ cartridge. The cartridge was pre-washed with hexane, ethyl ether and dichloromethane. AFB1 was eluted with chloroform + acetone (9 + 1) and evaporated to dryness. In method B, the oil sample was mixed with methanol + water (80 + 20), shaken and centrifuged. The supernatant was diluted 1:10 with water and 10ml of the diluted mixture transferred to an ‘Aflaprep’ immunoaffinity column for the clean-up step. AFB1 was eluted with acetonitrile and evaporated to dryness. AFB1 from both methods was derivatized to its hemiacetal (AFB2a) and then quantitated by HPLC using a C18 (60 A 4.6 x 250 mm) column with fluorescence detection. Both methods are simple, reliable and efficient, but method A showed a lower detection limit (2.8 ng/kg) than method B (56 ng/kg). With a 95% confidence level there was no significant difference in recovery between the two methods, which was 87.2% for method A and 84.8% for method B. In addition, application of a two-tailed F-test to the variances within spiked samples at concentrations 1, 2, 5 and 10 µg/kg separately showed that there was no significant difference in the precisions of the two methods. Fifty samples of olive oil of Greek origin produced between 1995 and 1998 were examined with both methods for the presence of AFB1. When analysing the samples with method B, the presence of AFB1 was not detected. The use of method A revealed the presence of AFB1 in 72% of the samples. The range of contamination was generally found to be very low (2.8–15.7 ng/kg), however one sample was contaminated with 46.3 ng/kg.
