208
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins in maize imported into the UK, 2004–2007

&
Pages 363-371 | Received 13 Jun 2008, Accepted 13 Aug 2008, Published online: 18 Mar 2009
 

Abstract

This study examined a total of 82 consignments of French and Argentinean raw maize as received at maize mills in the UK between 2004 and 2007. Samples were analysed for deoxynivalenol (DON), nivalenol (NIV), other trichothecenes, zearalenone (ZON), and fumonisins B1, B2, and B3 (FB1, FB2, and FB3) using fully validated analytical methods with limits of quantification of 10 µg kg−1 for DON, NIV, and each fumonisin mycotoxin and 3 µg kg−1 for ZON. All samples except two containing fumonisins met the European Commission statutory maximum permissible levels for DON, ZON, and FB1 + FB2 as operating in 2007. The maximum concentrations found for DON, NIV, ZON, and FB1 + FB2 were 444, 496, 165 and 5002 µg kg−1, respectively. Fumonisins were detected in almost every sample with 65% of Argentinean maize containing more than 1000 µg kg−1 of FB1 + FB2. In contrast, ZON was not detectable in almost 50% of consignments. During this period there was a distinct difference in mycotoxin concentrations between harvests and geographic origin. Flint maize from Argentina usually contained lower concentrations of DON and related trichothecenes and higher levels of fumonisins than maize from France, although concentrations of fumonisins up to 2000 µg kg−1 or greater occurred in samples from both regions. The incidence and concentrations of fumonisins were similar to those in a similar previous survey, while zearalenone concentrations were lower. The distribution of mycotoxins in multi-hold ships was also investigated showing that fumonisins were much more evenly distributed than DON, thus indicating their general level in the ship as a whole. The effect of cleaning regimes was found to be very variable, especially for DON, ranging from no removal of mycotoxins to greater than 50% in some instances, but was not related to concentration. Evidence here suggests that while cleaning is essential for removing foreign bodies before milling, it cannot be used as a reliable tool for reducing mycotoxins.

Acknowledgements

These studies were funded by the UK DEFRA, Food Quality and Safety LINK Programme and the UK Food Standards Agency, and would not have been possible without the enthusiastic cooperation and assistance from the staff of the three UK maize mills.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 799.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.