116
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Phonetic encoding of infrequent articulatory phonetic transitions

, , &
Pages 39-52 | Published online: 04 Aug 2011
 

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the underlying mechanisms responsible for the phonetic encoding of novel articulatory speech gestures (i.e., nonwords). Understanding these mechanisms is critical to gain a comprehensive realisation of normal speech production as well as insight into the nature of pathologic speech.

Aims: The following research questions were addressed: (1) Is there a significant difference in the response latency among low, moderate, and high interphonemic transitional frequencies in nonwords? (2) Is there a significant difference in the response latency among low and high lexical frequencies in real words? (3) Is there a significant difference in total durations among low, moderate, and high interphonemic transitional frequencies in nonwords?

Methods & Procedures: A total of 19 females between the ages of 50 and 79 repeated nonwords that were constructed in three interphonemic transitional frequency categories (low, moderate, high) and elicited in an immediate response condition.

Outcomes & Results: The results showed an expected significant difference of shorter response latency for the high‐frequency nonwords when compared to the moderate‐ and the low‐frequency nonwords, and an unexpected significantly shorter duration for the low‐frequency nonwords when compared to the moderate‐ and the high‐frequency nonwords.

Conclusions: Results are consistent with the interpretation that the high‐frequency nonwords were initiated immediately (short response latency) and encoded phonetically on‐line during production (longer nonwords duration), while the motor programs for the low‐frequency nonwords were pre‐loaded prior to initiation of production (longer response latency) and executed without update (shorter nonwords duration).

Notes

Address correspondence to: Diane L. Kendall PhD, Assistant Professor, University of Florida, Department of Neurology, Box 100236, Gainesville, Florida 32610‐0236, USA. Email: [email protected]

The authors would like to acknowledge VA RR&D Brain Rehabilitation and Research Center, University of Florida, Department of Neurology and University of Pittsburgh, Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Sheila Pratt

Address correspondence to: Diane L. Kendall PhD, Assistant Professor, University of Florida, Department of Neurology, Box 100236, Gainesville, Florida 32610‐0236, USA. Email: [email protected] The authors would like to acknowledge VA RR&D Brain Rehabilitation and Research Center, University of Florida, Department of Neurology and University of Pittsburgh, Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 386.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.