532
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Measuring quality of life in Dutch people with aphasia: development and psychometric evaluation of the SAQOL-39NL

, , &
Pages 189-200 | Received 15 Jan 2016, Accepted 11 Mar 2016, Published online: 08 Apr 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life (HRQL) scales is useful as it allows comparisons of therapy outcomes across different countries to be drawn.

Aims: To adapt the English Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life—39 item generic stroke scale (SAQOL-39g) into Dutch. To investigate the psychometric properties (acceptability, internal consistency, test–retest reliability and construct validity) of the Dutch version (SAQOL-39NL).

Methods & Procedures: Established guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures were followed. Individuals with chronic aphasia were recruited from six centres in The Netherlands. Participants completed the SAQOL-39NL and a visual analogue scale on HRQL in an interview format with an aphasia specialist speech and language therapist.

Outcomes & Results: The cross cultural adaptation resulted in a consensus version of the SAQOL-39NL, which participants (n = 13) felt was informative and of value in assessing the impact of stroke on their lives. The SAQOL-39NL was acceptable (no missing data; no floor or ceiling effects) to people with chronic aphasia (n = 47). Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89 for scale; 0.84–0.91 for domains) and test–retest reliability were excellent (ICC = 0.90 for scale, 0.70–0.93 for domains). Internal validity (moderate intercorrelations between domains) and convergent validity (r = 0.45) were good.

Conclusions: The SAQOL-39NL is a psychometrically sound measure of HRQL for Dutch speaking people with aphasia. As is common with new measures, its psychometric properties need to be evaluated further; and its appropriateness as a clinical outcome measure needs to be determined. Yet, the SAQOL-39NL is a promising new measure for use in clinical practice, audit and research.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to all participating aphasia centres and the aphasic participants, and the bachelor SLT students at the HU University of Applied Sciences who were involved in the first stages of the development of this instrument.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 386.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.