388
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Physiological and pathological covariates of persistent concussion-related fatigue: results from two regression methodologies

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 463-479 | Received 05 Apr 2018, Accepted 05 Jan 2019, Published online: 20 Jan 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Fatigue severity in persons with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) has received little research attention, despite its typically positively skewed nature. Investigation of covariates across a range of fatigue severity may provide insight into important contributors.

Objective: To assess the relative significance of a priori-hypothesized covariates of physiological and pathological (mental and physical) fatigue in persons with mTBI/concussion, applying ordinary least squares (OLS) and quantile regression (QR) approaches.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional investigation in 80 participants with mTBI/concussion (mean age 45.4 ± 10.1 years, 59% male). The fatigue severity scale (FSS) was used as an outcome measure. Predictors of this outcome, grouped into physiological and pathological models of fatigue were assessed using OLS and QR.

Results: The mean total FSS score was 46.13 ± 14.59, and the median was 49 (interquartile range 37–57), demonstrating positive skewness. Fatigue severity was associated with variables within the mental, psychological and psychiatric domains at different levels of the fatigue score distribution.

Conclusion: Results highlighted that some covariates had a significant impact on the FSS total score at non-central parts of its distribution, while others exhibited significant impact across the entire distribution. Addressing covariates of fatigue across the severity continuum can enhance research and clinical management.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Shirin Mollayeva for her assistance in checking data, the organization of the figures and proofreading the final version of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest to declare pertaining to this work. During the work on this study, the first author was supported by the Frederick Banting and Charles Best Research Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and a research grant from the Alzheimer’s Association (#AARF-16-442937). The last author is supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research Grant–Institute for Gender and Health (#CGW-126580). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Alzheimer’s Association [AARF-16-442937]; Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Institute for Gender and Health [CGW-126580].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 727.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.