The impact of horizontal and vertical Luminance SNARC compatibility on affective judgments

ABSTRACT

Research on the Spatial Quantity Association of Response Codes (SQUARC) has documented associations between spatial position and mental representations of quantity. Large quantities are associated with right and top, small quantities are associated with left and bottom. Resulting compatibility effects have largely been documented for response speed and judgment accuracy. Recently, employing luminance as quantity, Löffler et al. (2022) generalised such SQUARC compatibility effects to affective judgments, showing that horizontally SQUARC-compatible stimulus arrangements (i.e. bright on the right, dark on the left side) are liked more than SQUARC-incompatible arrangements. The present Experiment 1 (N = 296) replicated this horizontal compatibility effect, d_z = .18, and generalised it to vertical luminance SQUARC compatibility (i.e. bright on the top, dark on the bottom), d_z = .22. Experiments 2a-b (total N = 259; Experiment 2b preregistered) employed stimulus arrangements tilted by 45° to manipulate horizontal and vertical (in)compatibility simultaneously within the same stimulus, finding robust horizontal compatibility effects, but mixed evidence regarding vertical compatibility.

KEYWORDS:

• SQUARC
• cognitive processing
• affective judgments
• luminance

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 The condition means of that pilot on N = 48 (24 male, 24 female; M_age = 26, SD_age = 7) were M_HC = 3.42, SE_HC = .14; M_HI = 3.35, SE_HI = .15; M_VC = 3.26, SE_VC = .15; M_VI = 3.29, SE_VI = .15; M_{HC_VC} = 3.40, SE_{HC_VC} = .14; M_{HC_VI} = 3.37, SE_{HC_VI} = .13; M_{HI_VC} = 3.32, SE_{HI_VC} = .13; M_{HI_VI} = 3.35, SE_{HI_VI} = .14.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.