The impact of horizontal and vertical Luminance SNARC compatibility on affective judgments

References

• Calabria, M., & Rossetti, Y. (2005). Interference between number processing and line bisection: A methodology. Neuropsychologia, 43(5), 779–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantlon, J. F., Platt, M. L., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, R. Y. C., Wu, D. H., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Chang, E. C. (2012). Relative size of numerical magnitude induces a size-contrast effect on the grip scaling of reach-to-grasp movements. Cortex, 48(8), 1043–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 626–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L. (2007). The equality of quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 185–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. (2003). Spatial representations in number processing–evidence from a pointing task. Visual Cognition, 10(4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280244000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fumarola, A., Prpic, V., Da Pos, O., Murgia, M., Umiltà, C., & Agostini, T. (2014). Automatic spatial association for luminance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(3), 759–765. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0614-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerten, J., & Topolinski, S. (2019). Shades of surprise: Assessing surprise as a function of degree of deviance and expectation constraints. Cognition, 192, 103986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerten, J., & Topolinski, S. (2021). SNARC compatibility triggers positive affect. Cognition and Emotion, 35(2), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1846018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87(3), B87–B95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00234-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32(4), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell, G., & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00045-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadosh, R. C., Henik, A., & Walsh, V. (2007). Small is bright and big is dark in synaesthesia. Current Biology, 17(19), R834–R835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadosh, R. C., Kadosh, K. C., & Henik, A. (2008). When brightness counts: The neuronal correlate of numerical–luminance interference. Cerebral Cortex, 18(2), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keupp, S., Barbarroja, N., Topolinski, S., & Fischer, J. (2018). Are monkeys intuitive Aristotelians? Associations between target size and vertical target position in long-tailed macaques. Royal Society Open Science, 5(4), 170889. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirjakovski, A., & Utsuki, N. (2012). From SNARC to SQUARC: Universal mental quantity line? International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(2), 217. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v4n2p217
   Google Scholar
• Löffler, C. S., Gerten, J., Mamporia, M., Müller, J., Neu, T., Rumpf, J., Schiller, M., Schneider, Y., Wozniak, M., & Topolinski, S. (2022). Bright on the right feels right: SQUARC compatibility is hedonically marked. Cognition and Emotion, 36(4), 767–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2053660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson, I. A., & MacCormack, J. (2020). Avoiding left-to-right, top-to-bottom: An examination of high school students’ executive functioning skills and strategies for reading non-linear graphic text. Reading Psychology, 42(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2020.1837313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinel, P., Piazza, M., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments. Neuron, 41(6), 983–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00107-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, P., Nicholls, M. E., Ma, Y. Y., & Chen, L. (2011). Size matters: Non-numerical magnitude affects the spatial coding of response. PLoS One, 6(8), e23553. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, L., Schubert, T. W., & Topolinski, S. (2013). The effect of spatial elevation on respect depends on merit and medium. Social Psychology, 44(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. M. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(4), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., Likowski, K. U., Weyers, P., & Strack, F. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition & Emotion, 23(2), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930801994112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Opstal, F., & Verguts, T. (2013). Is there a generalized magnitude system in the brain? Behavioral, neuroimaging, and computational evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 435. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicario, C. M. (2011). Perceiving numbers affects the subjective temporal midpoint. Perception, 40(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicario, C. M. (2013). Landmark test and decision making: A reply to a reply. Perception, 42(3), 356–357. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hecker, U., Klauer, K. C., & Sankaran, S. (2013). Embodiment of social status: Verticality effects in multilevel rank-orders. Social Cognition, 31(3), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.3.374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar