228
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A comparison of real-world outdoor aging of Bacillus thuringiensis bioaerosols using Goldberg rotating drums and synthetic spider webs in Conroe, Texas

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 16-25 | Received 04 Apr 2023, Accepted 29 Sep 2023, Published online: 07 Nov 2023
 

Abstract

There are two predominant methods for understanding and studying bioaerosol aging: capture on microfibers, and Goldberg rotating drums. There are advantages and disadvantages to each approach depending on the experimental needs, cost, and timeline, but they have rarely been compared in parallel to determine the similarity of results. Experiments that use Goldberg drums have the advantage of studying aerosol particles in suspension, but due time resolution of aging processes is limited by chamber volume, sample volumes, and aerosol loss mechanisms. For microfiber experiments, particles are adhered to the fiber, and so only simulate natural aerosols, but there are significant advantages since particles are not lost during aging and the time resolution is not limited by sampling. In this study, we compared outdoor UV-transmitting Goldberg rotating drums with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) synthetic spider web material in a complex real-world environment during a summer near Houston, Texas. Bacillus thuringiensis al hakam spores were aerosolized into UV-transmitting, gas-permeable chambers that allowed relevant exposure to real-world atmospheric conditions while isolating particles of interest. Aging was compared for up to 4 h in both sunlight exposed and protected environments to compare and quantify relative degradation rates. The two disparate methodologies yielded similar results, with no statistical difference found in three out of four combinations of carbon-filtered air vs. ambient air, and protection from sunlight vs. exposure to sunlight, but this could vary for other particle sizes or organisms.

Copyright © 2023 American Association for Aerosol Research

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Morgan Minyard and Mr. Rick Mathieson for their guidance and technical insight, and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Additionally, we acknowledge and thank Dr. James Flynn, and the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Houston for gas-phase measurements and site access, along with the staff at the W.G. Jones State Forest.

Disclosure statement

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Funding

The Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) provided the funding for this research (HDTRA1310184).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 165.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.