ABSTRACT
Careful logging around advance growth and tree planting following site preparation or not (fill planting) have been widely used to regenerate black spruce (Picea mariana) stands in the boreal forest of Canada. An experiment was established in 1990 to compare these regeneration modes and natural seeding over a 25-year period following two types of scarification (cone- or disk-trenching) that were applied at two intensities (single- or double-pass). Without scarification, the three types of regeneration had slow height growth during the first 10 years (3.4–5.8 cm/year). Thereafter, planted seedlings (6.1–9.8 cm/year) and pre-established layers (5.8–8.5 cm/year) had 2–3 times higher growth than natural seedlings (2.6–3.1 cm/year). Scarification improved height growth of the three types of regeneration, but planted seedlings responded much earlier, and more strongly over the 25 years (+9.4 cm/year) than layers (+2.8 cm/year) and natural seedlings (+2.7 cm/year). A shift in the proportion of layers and natural seedlings was observed following treatment. Long-term monitoring revealed that double-pass scarification was beneficial to layer growth from years 15 to 20, while no positive effect was observed on natural or planted seedlings. Our results suggest that decades may be required for natural regeneration to respond to scarification in cold soils of the boreal forest.
Acknowledgements
We thank Nelson Thiffault for commenting on an earlier version of this manuscript, Lise Charette and Josianne DeBlois for their statistical advice, and William F.J. Parsons for his English language editing assistance. The Editor of the journal and two anonymous reviewers are also acknowledged for their helpful comments. Heartfelt thanks are extended to Jean-Pierre Lapointe, Maurice Gagnon, Julie Forgues, Carlo Gros-Louis, Daniel Guimond, Serge Williams, Pascal Lainé, Étienne Du Berger, Éric Saulnier, Jolène Lemieux, Louis Faucher, Gilles Audy and many summer students for their excellent fieldwork over the years. This study is part of Project 142332010 of the Direction de la recherche forestière, Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.