628
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Greater male vulnerability to stunting? Evaluating sex differences in growth, pathways and biocultural mechanisms

Pages 466-473 | Received 03 Feb 2021, Accepted 03 Jul 2021, Published online: 01 Feb 2022
 

Abstract

Context

Child stunting has increasingly become the focus of large-scale global health efforts with the inclusion of stunting eradication as one of the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations. Child sex has been identified as a biological risk factor for stunting, and sex-specific approaches to stunting prevention have been proposed.

Objective

This paper examines four pathways, developmental sensitivity, energetics, caretaking and measurement, proposed to contribute to sex differences in linear growth faltering and stunting risk.

Methods

Anthropological, public health and clinical literature on sex differences in stunting and the mechanisms contributing to variability across contexts are reviewed.

Results

The direction of sex differences in stunting prevalence varies across countries and between households. Sex differences in growth trajectories and immune function beginning prenatally place boys at greater risk of infection and undernutrition, but these biological differences are interpreted by parents and within household contexts that are shaped by social and cultural norms which, in turn, influence care and feeding practices.

Conclusion

A perspective that incorporates an examination of the social and environmental factors shaping child growth in specific contexts is needed to understand sex-based vulnerability to stunting and to develop context-appropriate interventions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author contributions

ALT conducted the research and drafted the manuscript. The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article. Research reported in this publication was supported by NICHD of the National Institutes of Health under award number P2C HD050924.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.