Abstract
The use of student-led collaborative learning activities at university level has increased dramatically in recent decades. However, whether such activities foster engagement in self-regulated, deep-learning practices remains contentious, with evidence that desirable learning outcomes are often not achieved. A metacognitive intervention was designed to induce groups of students to engage in productive learning from each other, while working on a clinical case-based group assignment. The intervention introduced students to a twofold metacognitive strategy aimed at enhancing learning through meaning making in group interactions and high-level questioning. The research involved a semi-experimental design, with a previous student cohort providing control data. Observation and self-report data converged to show that the intervention led to increased time spent on case content-discussion, but not at the desired deep level. The intervention's positive impact was also evident in self-reports of personal goals, perceived difficulty of the assignment, group and task challenges, and evaluations of learning.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported under the Australian Research Council's Discovery Projects funding scheme (project number DP0986867).