98
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Optimal mix among PAYGO, EET and individual savings

, , &
Pages 463-505 | Received 30 Apr 2022, Accepted 18 Oct 2023, Published online: 31 Oct 2023
 

Abstract

In order to deal with the aging problem, the pension system is actively transformed into the funded scheme. However, the funded scheme does not completely replace PAYGO (Pay as You Go) scheme and there exist heterogeneous mixes among PAYGO, EET (Exempt, Exempt, Taxed) and individual savings in different countries. In this paper, we establish the optimal mix by solving a Nash equilibrium between the pension participants and the government. Given the obligatory PAYGO and EET contribution rates, the participants choose the optimal asset allocation of the individual savings and the consumption policies to achieve the objective. The results extend the ‘Samuelson-Aaron’ criterion to age-dependent preference orderings. Under the baseline model, we identify three critical ages to distinguish the multiple outcomes of preference orderings based on heterogeneous characteristic parameters. The government is fully aware of the optimal feedback of the participants. It chooses the optimal PAYGO and EET contribution rates to maximize the overall utility of the participants weighted by each cohort's population. As such, the negative population growth rate leads to the decline of the PAYGO attractiveness as well as the increase of the older cohorts' weight in the government's decision-making. The optimal mix is the comprehensive result of the two effects.

2010 Mathematics Subject Classifications:

JEL CLASSIFICATIONS:

Acknowledgments

The authors are particularly grateful to the two anonymous referees and the editor whose suggestions greatly improve the manuscript's quality. The authors also thank the members of the group of Actuarial Sciences and Mathematical Finance at the Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University for their feedbacks and useful conversations.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The authors acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 12271290, 11871036].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 147.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.