ABSTRACT
This article is about being and becoming a qualitative researcher in Turkey, a context with a distinctive quantitative tradition shaped by the post-positivist paradigm where qualitative research has not yet reached the mature stage it enjoys elsewhere. Exploring the challenges of swimming against the tide unattended and keeping going, it argues learning to do research is more about crafting an identity than it is about learning a set of tools and techniques. Rather, it is a process largely influenced by the context in which the researcher’s identity is shaped, one that is characterized by power dynamics and identity negotiations. These issues are largely neglected in the literature.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Professor Ciaran Sugrue, Professor Duncan Waite and journal reviewers for their invaluable comments on this manuscript, which are much appreciated.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1 The second author has since completed her doctoral studies.
2 We contend with Gee’s (Citation2008) definition of Discourse as ‘distinctive ways of acting, interacting, valuing, feeling, dressing, thinking, believing, with other people … so as to enact specific socially recognizable identities engaged in specific socially recognizable activities’ (p. 155).