Re-inventing researcher identity: when the individual interacts with the contextual power dynamics

References

• Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 17–31. doi: 10.1080/03075070701794775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P., & Delamont, S. (2006). In the roiling smoke: Qualitative inquiry and contested fields. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 747–755. doi: 10.1080/09518390600975974
   Google Scholar
• Baker, V. L., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Developmental networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 807–827. doi: 10.1080/03075070903501887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnacle, R. (2005). Research education ontologies: Exploring doctoral becoming. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(2), 179–188. doi: 10.1080/07294360500062995
   Google Scholar
• Barnacle, R., & Dall’Alba, G. (2014). Beyond skills: Embodying writerly practices through the doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1139–1149. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.777405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, J. A. (2012). The unfolding of methodological identity: An autobiographical study using humor, competing voices, and twists. The Qualitative Report, 17(35), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, F., & Schreier, M. (2007). Issues in learning about and teaching qualitative research methods and methodology in the social sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Social Research, 8(1), Art. 30. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0701307
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A., Boud, D., & Namgung, S. U. (2011). Influences on the formation of academics: The role of the doctorate and structured development opportunities. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 51–66. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2010.515575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion, M. A., Pursell, E. D., & Brown, B. K. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 25–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00630.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carawan, L. W., Knight, S., Wittman, P., Pokorny, M., & Velde, B. P. (2011). On becoming a qualitative researcher: A view through the lens of transformative learning. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31(4), 387–399. doi: 10.1080/08841233.2011.597671
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (2003). The foundations of social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2009). The elephant in the living room: Or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 139–160. doi: 10.1177/1468794108098034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., & Giardina, M. D. (2006). Disciplining qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 769–782. doi: 10.1080/09518390600975990
   Google Scholar
• Elizabeth, V., & Grant, B. M. (2013). ‘The spirit of research has changed’: Reverberations from researcher identities in managerial times. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(1), 122–135. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.751362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589/3095
   Google Scholar
• Englander, K., & Uzuner-Smith, S. (2013). The role of policy in constructing the peripheral scientist in the era of globalization. Language Policy, 12(3), 231–250. doi: 10.1007/s10993-012-9268-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennals, P., Fortune, T., Williams, A., & D’Cruz, K. (2016). Shifting occupational identity: Doing, being, becoming and belonging in the academy. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(3), 433–446. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1107884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, C. (1997). Learning to teach qualitative research. Marriage & Family Review, 24(3–4), 241–274. doi: 10.1300/J002v24n03_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, S. (1996). Music and identity. In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 108–127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K. (2008). ‘What’s too much and what’s too little?’: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326–350. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2008.11772101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Giampapa, F. (2011). The politics of ‘being and becoming’ a researcher: Identity, power, and negotiating the field. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 10(3), 132–144. doi: 10.1080/15348458.2011.585304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches (Vol. xxv). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L., & Burns, L. (2009). Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 49–70. doi: 10.17763/haer.79.1.wr25486891279345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’? In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., MacGibbon, L., & Morton, M. (2001). Regimes of trustworthiness in qualitative research: The rigors of reciprocity. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(3), 323–345. doi: 10.1177/107780040100700305
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Hernández, F., & Sancho-Gil, J. M. (2015). A learning process within an education research group: An approach to learning qualitative research methods. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 651–667. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1049468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W. J., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, M. L., & White, J. (2013). Relational inquiries and the research interview: Mentoring future researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(3), 179–188. doi: 10.1177/1077800412466224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, F. (2013). ‘And so betwixt them both’: Taking insights from literary analysis into higher education research. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(1), 70–82. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.750647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluge, M. A. (2001). Confessions of a beginning qualitative researcher. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 9(3), 329–335. doi: 10.1123/japa.9.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapadat, J. C. (2009). Writing our way into shared understanding: Collaborative autobiographical writing in the qualitative methods class. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(6), 955–979. doi: 10.1177/1077800409334185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2004). This is your father’s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 15–34. doi: 10.1177/1077800403256154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35–57. doi: 10.1080/09518390500450144
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Roth, W. M. (2003). Becoming and belonging: Learning qualitative research through legitimate peripheral participation. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(2), Art. 35. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/708/1535
   Google Scholar
• Lietz, C. A., Langer, C. L., & Furman, R. (2006). Establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research in social work implications from a study regarding spirituality. Qualitative Social Work, 5(4), 441–458. doi: 10.1177/1473325006070288
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, L., Schryer, C. F., Spafford, M. M., & Campbell, S. L. (2007). Negotiating the politics of identity in an interdisciplinary research team. Qualitative Research, 7(4), 501–519. doi: 10.1177/1468794107082305
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. G. (1999). Storylines: Craft artists’ narratives of identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2005). Editorial: Qualitative research is not a modification of quantitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 15(8), 1003–1005. doi: 10.1177/1049732305280771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, B. N. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31. doi: 10.2307/3587803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin, K. L. (2007). Teaching qualitative research: Lessons from practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(3), 431–458. doi: 10.1177/0011000006294813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Reed-Danahay, D. E. (1997). Introduction. In D. E. Reed-Danahay (Ed.), Auto-ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Spry, T. (2001). Performing autoethnography: An embodied methodological praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 706–732. doi: 10.1177/107780040100700605
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., & Gunter, H. (2011). Inside, outside, upside down: The fluidity of academic researcher ‘identity’ in working with/in school. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 34(1), 17–30. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2011.552309
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., & Walker, M. (2010). Doctoral education in context: The changing nature of the doctorate and doctoral students. In M. Walker & P. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral supervisor’s companion (pp. 9–26). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big-tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. doi: 10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urrieta, L. J. (2007). Figured worlds and education: An introduction to the special issue – Springer. The Urban Review, 39(2), 107–116. doi: 10.1007/s11256-007-0051-0
   Google Scholar
• Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., & Johnson, K. A. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4(1), 21–44. doi: 10.1207/s15327701jlie0401_2
   Google Scholar
• Waite, D. (2014). Teaching the unteachable: Some issues of qualitative research pedagogy. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(3), 267–281. doi: 10.1177/1077800413489532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waitere, H. J., Wright, J., Tremaine, M., Brown, S., & Pausé, C. J. (2011). Choosing whether to resist or reinforce the new managerialism: The impact of performance-based research funding on academic identity. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 205–217. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.509760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, D. (2007). On becoming a qualitative researcher: The value of reflexivity. Qualitative Report, 12(1), 82–101.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S. (2013). Surviving as a qualitative researcher in a quantitative world: A personal reflection. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(1), 81–85. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2012.709803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar