104
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Evaluation of Liver Metabolism Biomarkers in Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease According to Obesity Phenotype

, , , , , & show all
Pages 140-147 | Received 20 Jul 2021, Accepted 11 Nov 2021, Published online: 15 Feb 2022
 

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the relationship between the biochemical markers of liver metabolism in different stages of Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) according to the obesity phenotype.

Methodology

This is a cross-sectional study with individuals with class III obesity classified according to the obesity phenotypes proposed by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria. Biochemical and anthropometric variables were analyzed according to the staging of MAFLD and obesity phenotype.

Results

A total of 50 subjects with MAFLD, 62% (n = 31) with steatosis and 38% (n = 19) with steatohepatitis without fibrosis; 36% were classified as metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) and 64% as metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUHO), respectively. Mean values of alkaline phosphatase were 85.44 ± 27.27 vs. 61.92 ± 17.57 (p = 0.006); gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, 25.77 ± 15.36 vs. 30.63 ± 19.49 (p = 0.025); and albumin, 3.99 ± 0.34 vs. 4.24 ± 0.23 (p = 0.037), were lower and statistically significant in the MHO group with steatosis. The results show when considering individuals with IR, only AP is a predictor of unhealthy phenotype (B-0.934, 0.848- 1.029, p = 0.031).

Conclusion

MHO individuals with steatosis present lower severe changes related to markers of liver damage and function and AP is considered the predictor of MUHO phenotype.

Author contributions

A.R. conceived and designed the experiments; L.M.L., L. B., A.C., and C.S. performed the experiments; R.M. analyzed the data; L.M.L., A.C., M. L., R. M. and A.R wrote the paper.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The authors acknowledge the support received from Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ - Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio de Janeiro; Scientist of Our State), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq- National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) and CAPES – Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education within the Ministry of Education of Brazil.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 139.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.