285
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Promising antibacterials for LLM of Staphylococcus aureus using virtual screening, molecular docking, dynamics, and MMPBSA

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 7277-7289 | Received 08 Apr 2022, Accepted 25 Aug 2022, Published online: 08 Sep 2022
 

Abstract

In S. aureus, lipophilic membrane (LLM) protein is a methicillin resistance factor and is an essential role in peptidoglycan metabolism. The virtual screening of antibacterial molecules against the model of LLM was performed to identify the potent antibacterial molecules. Molecular docking results of pharmacokinetic filtered molecules illustrated that five molecules had higher binding affinities than tunicamycin (TUM) and were stabled via non-covalent interactions (hydrogen bond and hydrophobic interactions) at the active site of LLM. Further, molecular dynamics results revealed that binding of identified antibacterial molecules with LLM resulted in stable LLM-inhibitor(s) complexes. Molecular Mechanics/Position-Boltzmann Surface Area (MMPBSA) analysis showed that LLM-inhibitor(s) complexes had high binding affinities in the range of −213.49 ± 2.24 to −227.42 ± 3.05 kJ/mol. The amino acid residues decomposition analysis confirmed that identified antibacterial molecules bound at the active site (Asn148, Leu149, Asp151, Asp208, His269, His271, and His272) of LLM. Noticeably, the current study found five antibacterial molecules (BDE 27575101, BDE 33638168, BDE 33672484, LAS 51502073, and BDE 25098678) were highly potent than TUM and even than earlier reported molecules. Therefore, here reported antibacterial molecules may be used directly or developed to inhibit LLM of S. aureus.

Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

Acknowledgment

Authors thankful to NMRbox (National Center for Biomolecular NMR Data Processing and Analysis, supported by NIH grant no. P41GM111135 (NIGMS)) to provide the computational facility for molecular dynamics work.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,074.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.