Comprehensive in silico analysis of prolactin receptor (PRLR) gene nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) reveals multifaceted impact on protein structure, function, and interactions

Abstract

This study delves into the functional and structural implications of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) within the Prolactin Receptor (PRLR) gene. Thirteen deleterious nsSNPs were identified through bioinformatics tools, with SIFT predicting 168 out of 395 nsSNPs as detrimental, exhibiting tolerance index (TI) scores ranging from 0 to 0.05. Polyphen2 assigned likelihood scores >0.99 to all 13 nsSNPs, indicating high probability of harm, while Panther scores classified most nsSNPs as ‘probably damaging’, with specific mutations like W218R scoring 0.74, suggesting a higher impact. Stability analysis using DDG I-Mutant and DDG Mupro consistently predicted decreased stability for all mutations, with CUPSAT indicating mutations like V125G and W218R significantly decreasing stability. Structural analysis through DynaMut predicted destabilization for all mutations except L196I and L292H. MutPred2 highlighted structural alterations for all nsSNPs except L196I, L293V, R315W, and S353N. Domain analysis revealed key mutations within essential functional domains, with five nsSNPs located within Fibronectin type-III domains. Bayesian analysis through ConSurf identified 9 critical residues, with 11 nsSNPs exhibiting notably high conservation. STRING analysis unveiled a complex interaction network, indicating involvement in vital biological processes like lactation. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, spanning 100 nanoseconds, elucidated structural dynamics induced by detrimental missense SNPs. Post-translational modification (PTM) analysis identified specific mutations, such as R351, involved in methylation, while S353 was implicated in phosphorylation and glycosylation. These findings offer comprehensive insights into the molecular and phenotypic effects of deleterious nsSNPs in the PRLR gene, crucial for selective breeding.

Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

Keywords:

• Prolactin receptor, protein structure
• molecular dynamics simulations
• bioinformatics analysis
• protein-protein interactions
• functional consequences

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Data availability statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.