299
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Archival Mocking As Feminist Praxis: A Rhetorical Repurposing of A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes

Pages 23-43 | Published online: 12 May 2020
 

Abstract

My ironic rereading of Thomas Taylor’s Vindication of the Rights of Brutes accomplishes five tasks: First, I provide readers with an introduction to Thomas Taylor (one of protofeminist Mary Wollstonecraft’s harshest critics) and the satiric text he wrote specifically to undermine her. Second, I assess how the inherent instability of textual meaning provides a rationale for ironically reclaiming a text in the service of feminist emancipation (and, in the case of Taylor’s Vindication, animal emancipation). Third, I offer the ecological metaphor of “repurposing” as justification for what I call “mocking as method.” Fourth, using this ironic methodology, I ironize Taylor’s already-ironic Vindication by reading it literally, thus rhetorically repurposing Taylor’s textual garbage into a coherent vegan ecofeminist argument for animal rights. Finally, I theorize mocking as method as a rhetorical tool suitable not only for advancing vegan ecofeminist argumentation, but also for feminist criticism writ large. By attending to the instability of meaning in a text’s ever-changing contexts, mocking as method moves critics from simply trashing a garbage text toward rhetorically repurposing it to advance arguments for social justice. If done well, this technique not only avoids wasting a text but can empower the marginalized and contribute to the composition of complex, sustainable rhetorical canons.

Notes

1 Critiques of early ecofeminist theory included some theorists’ tendencies to (1) argue for women’s inherent closeness to nature (Griffin, Citation1974); (2) disregard the racial and class differences of women for the sake of universal (and at times culturally appropriated) “goddess” sisterhood (Christ, Citation1978); (3) engage in cisnormativity (Daly, Citation1978); and (4) refuse critical interrogations of an abstract, pristine, and overly romanticized concept of “nature” and “wilderness” (Plant, Citation1989).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.