Progressive corneal ectatic disease in pregnancy

ABSTRACT

Pregnancy influences ocular changes which may exacerbate existing or develop new pathology. This review summarises the existing evidence on the association between pregnancy and progressive keratoconus or iatrogenic keratectasia. Ten online databases were searched systematically. Eligible studies were published in English and reported objective ophthalmic outcomes for women with evidence of (i) a new diagnosis of keratoconus, (ii) keratoconus progression or (iii) iatrogenic keratectasia following refractive surgery; during or within one year of pregnancy. Strength of evidence was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence. Seventeen articles have reported 33 peripartum women with new-onset or progressive ectasia, evident by signs of corneal hydrops or protrusion (n = 8); steepening on topography imaging (n = 20); a mean decline in best corrected visual acuity by +0.20 logMAR (95% CI −0.01 to +0.40, n = 23); a mean increase in maximum keratometry by 2.18 D (95% CI 1.44 to 2.91, n = 42); a mean decline in spherical equivalent refraction by −1.33 D (95% CI −1.73 to −0.93, n = 41); and a mean increase in astigmatism by −1.61 D (95% CI −2.46 to −0.75, n = 19). Pregnancy is associated with progressive ectasia in some women including those with previously stable keratoconus, or a history of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis surgery or no history of corneal ectasia. This review highlights the heterogeneity in limited existing evidence, the need for a standardised definition of ectasia progression and further prospective studies for clinical guidelines. Closely monitoring women at risk may assist in early intervention with collagen cross-linking and prevent peripartum vision loss.

KEYWORDS:

• Keratoconus
• Iatrogenic keratectasia
• ectasia
• cornea
• pregnancy

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Joan Ready Ophthalmology Research Fund administered by the University of Auckland School of Medicine Foundation. The sponsor or funding organisation had no role in the design or conduct of this research.