156
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices

Encouraging student engagement, interaction, and learning via online discussion boards: Reflections on using Yellowdig in the COVID-19 era

ORCID Icon
Pages 133-143 | Published online: 28 Sep 2023
 

Abstract

In the COVID-19 era, Yellowdig (an online discussion board with social media-like features) has increasingly risen to prominence in higher education. Reflecting on a multi-year experiment involving 14 international business and marketing courses, I argue that Yellowdig remains a valuable tool for learning even after returning to face-to-face classes. Nonetheless, my experience also highlights its limitations. While Yellowdig is not a panacea for social learning, it can provide a versatile platform for student interaction and engagement, provided that instructors maintain a clear purpose and realistic expectations. I present key considerations to help instructors optimize their use of Yellowdig.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Gary Barnes and Daniel Sullivan for their insights, suggestions, and professional opinions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 More recently, Shea and Bidjerano (Citation2010) proposed the addition of a fourth construct to the model: learner presence, referring to self-efficacy and individual effort. For a more detailed literature review of the community of inquiry model, see Rourke and Kanuka (Citation2009).

2 The company recommends a conversation ratio (total number of comments divided by total number of posts) of 8 or more. While the pedagogical value of focusing heavily on encouraging comments/reactions rather than original content is up for debate, Yellowdig’s developers contend that “the intended purpose of the gamification point system in Yellowdig is to alter behavior, not assess it, and to get students interacting with their peers” (Savvides et al., Citation2019).

3 Three outliers from Fall 2020 were excluded from the calculation: 542.3 and 154.6% (minimum word counts were accidentally left on Yellowdig’s default settings) and −37.8% (due to teething problems, several students were granted a make-up assignment late in the course, which allowed them to post short comments).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 64.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.