702
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A qualitative analysis of attitudes to face transplants: Contrasting views of the general public and medical professionals

&
Pages 1589-1605 | Received 29 Jan 2010, Accepted 27 Nov 2010, Published online: 13 Jun 2011
 

Abstract

While there has been a considerable criticism and debate about face transplantation from ethicists, surgeons and psychologists, little is known about the attitudes of medical professionals and the general public whose support will be necessary if face transplants are to be accepted. This study therefore conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with medical professionals (8) and the general public (8) to explore their understanding of and attitudes to face transplants. A thematic analysis was used to analyse these data. Five overarching themes were identified including agreement in principal, caveats and conditions, medical and technical difficulties, function and appearance, and the significance of the human face. The analysis revealed overwhelming support in principle for face transplants, but with important caveats and conditions. Both groups shared clear representations of deserving and undeserving candidates, and concerns about psychological adjustment. The general public sample demonstrated little understanding of medical implications or the consequences of a failed graft, which did concern the medical professionals. Neither group showed a clear understanding of the psychological or social factors required to predict best outcomes and identify suitable candidates. Analyses revealed a stereotypical belief from both groups that the life of a severely disfigured recipient is intolerable without this operation.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants, Professor Phillip Terry and Dr Harriet Tenenbaum for their comments and thoughts on an earlier draft of this article, and the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Kingston University for a small research grant that made this study possible.

Notes

Note

1. Further discussion of the stereotypical nature of these representations of ‘disfigured’ people is included in the next theme ‘caveats and conditions’.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 458.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.